Cybersecurity firm Crowdstrike pushed an update that caused millions of Windows computers to enter recovery mode, triggering the blue screen of death. Learn …

      • General_Shenanigans@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        This happened because a file that CrowdStrike pushed out, which by their own processes is not one that is signed, was immediately pushed out with one of their updates. This update was pushed directly through CrowdStrike’s own method, not via Windows Update. CrowdStrike maintains this capability in order to quickly respond to and prevent security threats. The fact that they have .sys files that aren’t signed is crazy on its own, and a huge screwup by CrowdStrike. So many companies relied upon and trusted this company because up until now, everybody considered it a great product, so it was extremely popular and prevalent. It’s been a huge wake up call for everybody in I.T.

        • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I’m not sure if you intended to reply to me, but I am aware of this. Thanks for checking my understanding though :)

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        4 months ago

        In a way, it was. If Windows was not as crappy as it is, external solutions would not be needed.

        • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Linux machines also require Crowdstrike because of business requirements. That does mean Linux is just as crap as Windows then?

        • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Is your point “Linux and Mac dont get viruses or targeted for cyberattacks”?

          Or is it “This wouldn’t have broken on a different operating system”?

          • Treczoks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            No to both. Windows is so broken, it needs kernel-level external software to protect it from attacks that should not be possible in the first place. It is a joke of history that this software was even worse than windows itself.

            • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I see you’re operating on a plane of reality where windows is the only bad software, so it’s kinda pointless for me to continue here. I hope you have a wonderful day.

              • Treczoks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Windows is definitely not the only bad software, but for the amount of resources they could spend on quality, it is a rather shitty product. They could do better, but they don’t want to.

      • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t hear about billions of Linux or Mac computers going down all at the same time. I’m hearing that windows allows a simple text file change to bring down all of them at the same time.

          • Entropywins@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            4 months ago

            They are most likely uninformed with a very strong opinion based on how they feel…while I’d like to call them a moron I’ve done this exact thing and like to think I’m not a moron.

          • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Even if you write assembly code straight out like a total hacker, it’s still a text file. Literally jump 0x12345 is text. And if it’s just a few kilobits long, then it’s a simple text file yes. Got anything else to ad? Specially if the file actually doesn’t work and the system made to run it “windows” is such shit that every copy of it got halted.

            • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Yes and at the end of the day it’s all just binary getting dumped into a cache and processed by the CPU. The point is that the intent of the file matters and while they do both hold text, the intent, purpose, and handling of the kernel mode/ring 0 driver is much different than a “simple text file”

              So different in fact, that as another user pointed out, it has happened to Linux too