• nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’d like to see a requirement that products and devices which have been deemed by their manufacturer to be end of sale/support/repair/life are required to be unlocked, with technical schematics and repair documentation made freely available, upon request of the owner.

    • OCATMBBL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I support it at face value, but as someone who knows little about what this exactly means/involves - what are the risks for misuse by others if everything becomes publicly available and stops making developments?

      • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        I see it just gets incorporated into their business model.

        I’d argue it would meaningfully suppress the incentive for planned obsolescence for good faith manufacturers, and it opens up repurposing of equipment from less reputable entities.