Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 5 days agoOpinion: Harris’s agenda mirrors the Democratic Socialists of Americawww.msn.comexternal-linkmessage-square231fedilinkarrow-up119arrow-down169
arrow-up1-50arrow-down1external-linkOpinion: Harris’s agenda mirrors the Democratic Socialists of Americawww.msn.comSocialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 5 days agomessage-square231fedilink
minus-squarePeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·4 days ago1, voting is not harm reduction, and 2, that video has given you a false conclusion. the lesson we should learn is that strategic voting leads to party consolidation, and the only way to keep third parties is to continue to vote for them.
minus-squarepooperNickel@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day ago Yes absolutely it is 2. I remember this account and it makes total sense you’re campaigning for Jill fucking Stein. Jesus Christ 🤮
minus-squarePeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·1 day agoharm reduction is a specific thing. voting is not harm reduction.
minus-squarepooperNickel@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoUnless you care about truth in which case it absolutely is harm reduction
minus-squarePeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·23 hours agoharm reduction has a specific definition. voting is not harm reduction.
minus-squarepooperNickel@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·22 hours agoNot really interested in your pedantry that probably isn’t even technically correct (not that it matters)
minus-squarePeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·22 hours agohttps://www.indigenousaction.org/voting-is-not-harm-reduction-an-indigenous-perspective/
minus-squarepooperNickel@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·22 hours agoThe url itself says it’s talking about a specific context that has nothing to do with this.
minus-squarePeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·20 hours agoI can’t make you read
1, voting is not harm reduction, and 2, that video has given you a false conclusion. the lesson we should learn is that strategic voting leads to party consolidation, and the only way to keep third parties is to continue to vote for them.
harm reduction is a specific thing. voting is not harm reduction.
Unless you care about truth in which case it absolutely is harm reduction
harm reduction has a specific definition. voting is not harm reduction.
Not really interested in your pedantry that probably isn’t even technically correct (not that it matters)
https://www.indigenousaction.org/voting-is-not-harm-reduction-an-indigenous-perspective/
The url itself says it’s talking about a specific context that has nothing to do with this.
I can’t make you read