• 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Agree on the application side, but when it comes to the test suite, I’m definitely gonna consider letting an AI get that file started and then I’ll run through, make sure the assertions are all what I would expect and refactor anything that needs it.

    I’ve written countless tests in my career and I’m still gonna write countless more, but I’m glad I can at least spend less time on laborious repetition now and more time on the part of the job I actually enjoy which is actually solving problems.

    • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Things like unit tests I just have AI do it all now. Since running the test tells you your coverage you can verify if it got everything or not.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Here’s something that might blow your mind. Coverage is not the point of tests.

        If you your passing test gets 100% coverage, you can still have a bug. You might have a bunch of conditions you’re not handling and a shit test that doesn’t notice.

        Write tests first to completely define what you want the code to do, and then write the code to pass the tests.