• David Gerard@awful.systemsM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I am well acquainted with this genre of article and I ain’t reading all that. Not bothering to be involved with this example was the obviously correct decision, even if Trace kept nagging after I’d already said “no thank you” (that famous rationalist grasp of consent).

    This in the companion article caught my eye:

    While I am not personally a rationalist,

    Trace, I have some unfortunate news for you.

    • Phil@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I regret to inform you that Trace is hate-reading awful.systems too & has posted this comment on their Twitter.

      You’d think these people would have learned by now that there’s no upside in them spending their precious time on this earth obsessing over why a group of people don’t like them, but nevertheless here they are: drawn like moths to the flame.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        There would be an upside if they could magically acquire some self-awareness, and reflect on why a whole group thinks their ideas are idiotic. Alas,

        • Soyweiser@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Yeah see also his denouncement of Roko’s Basilisk (ctrl-f the page), we know it wasn’t that important, the funny part was that it was a dumb rehash of Pascals wager, and that at the time Yud took is very seriously.

          Wood also doesn’t seem to link to the actual Rationalwiki article which also makes clear that Yud doesn’t really believe in it (probably). It also mentions just how few (but above the 5% lizardman constant, so cause for concern, if they took their own ideas and MH seriously) people were worried about it. And every now and then you do find a person online who does take the idea seriously and worries about it, which is a bit of a concern. So oddly they should take it more seriously but only because it wrecks a small percentage of minds.

          It is weird to not mention Yuds freakout:

          Listen to me very closely, you idiot.

          YOU DO NOT THINK IN SUFFICIENT DETAIL ABOUT SUPERINTELLIGENCES CONSIDERING WHETHER OR NOT TO BLACKMAIL YOU. THAT IS THE ONLY POSSIBLE THING WHICH GIVES THEM A MOTIVE TO FOLLOW THROUGH ON THE BLACKMAIL.

          There’s an obvious equilibrium to this problem where you engage in all positive acausal trades and ignore all attempts at acausal blackmail. Until we have a better worked-out version of TDT and we can prove that formally, it should just be OBVIOUS that you DO NOT THINK ABOUT DISTANT BLACKMAILERS in SUFFICIENT DETAIL that they have a motive toACTUALLY[sic] BLACKMAIL YOU.

          And pretend this was just a blip and nothing more. Mf’er acted like he was in Stross novel.

          (Also after not clearly sharing the information about Roko’s Basilisks history, and we sneer at it, I came across this sentence: “then cites his pet article on Roko’s Basilisk directly while giggling about how mad it made Yudkowsky fans.” lol, no selfawareness there wood).

          • barsquid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Roko’s basilisk is one of my favorite things because of the combination of how stupid it is and also how utterly panicked they all were. Desperately imagining magical communication across time and space with their dumb paperclip demon and panicking.

            Why don’t they just believe in a deity if they want one so bad?