Summary

Many Democrats, especially women, expressed disillusionment and frustration online, viewing the result as a reflection of deep-seated misogyny in the U.S.

Harris supporters highlighted anger that a “felony convicted, twice-impeached” Trump prevailed over a female candidate.

Comparisons to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 loss resurfaced, with many attributing Trump’s win to targeted appeals to young men, including appearances with influencers like Joe Rogan.

The election outcome has intensified concerns over growing right-wing radicalization among young men.

  • PolydoreSmith@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Completely agree, but I’ve been seeing so many similar sentiments on Lemmy since the election. Today I saw someone comment, almost word for word, that there was no problem with Kamala’s campaign - the issue was simply that Americans are too stupid. Someone else on a totally different post commented that this election proves the Dems could run Jesus Christ himself and half the country would still reject him. And those are just two examples. This is one of more unhinged meltdowns I’ve ever seen.

    • Vent@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Dems could run Jesus Christ himself and half the country would still reject him

      I mean, that is undeniably true, but we’ve known that for a lot longer than two days.

      • swunchy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 month ago

        Dems would never run Jesus Christ because they only run sellout genocidal cartoon villains

    • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      I get the anger from dems against those who didn’t vote but honestly that’s more on the democratic party for not putting forward a candidate that earned those votes than anything else. Neither candidate is “entitled” to votes, just because the other candidate is abhorrent. I do think things will get considerably worse now and that’ll hopefully teach those who didn’t vote that yes that can happen and they should vote but the decision not to isn’t on the electorate, it’s the party that felt like they deserved votes they didn’t earn.

      • sepi@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Dem party has no obligation to court voters that won’t show up. Dems should not even bother with that segment ever again. This is why Dems were trying to convert more centrist republicans that do know how to show up and vote.

        • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s stupid. People won’t show up tp vote for a party that doesn’t represent their values and the dems aren’t just entitled to votes because trump is the opponent. You can’t win an election on just “the other guy is worse”. You need policies that galvanise your voter base and actually makes a difference in their lives so they don’t feel voting for either party is a waste of time. Objectively trump is worse but it’s on the dems to convince the voters of that and they failed horribly.