I hope photos of cooked animal flesh will one day be banned on all respectable Fediverse servers.

@vegan #Vegan #MastoAdmin

  • Firestorm Druid@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d love for that to happen. But I fear as long as eating animals is as accepted in society as it is today, this’ll take a long time.

    Fight the good fight though, my dude.

  • Finley Ⓥ@transden.lgbt
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    @nm @vegan

    In the past, I’ve requested CWs for meat. Because seriously it is pretty triggering for me to see a giant, bloody steak while I’m just casually scrolling through my timeline.

  • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really wish Facebook would ban pictures of dead animals people have hunted. It’s horrible when it comes on your feed.

  • Melissa Ratisher Ⓥ@veganism.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    @nm @vegan I hope so too, also just photos of dead animals, period. The pictures of douchebags with the animals they killed, etc.

    My local paper put a photo of a dead deer on the cover once for some story, and I still can’t understand how something like that makes it through a whole editorial process, but I guess that is the world we live in. For now. :hope:

  • kwomp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    How to self-marginalize as quickly as possible while making the least impact on society

      • kwomp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I suggest a social structure based on competition (wich has winners, thus increases injustice) decreases empathy, solidarity. This makes both animals and humans suffer. The incentive to change said structure (wich is always opposed to the work/risk it requires) is higher, the more it improves the chances of life getting better. Human life is more powerfull in that sense, compared to animal life. In other words: It is more likely to get humans to (severly) improve the world for humans. We are stronger wired for empathy with humans. Empathy with animals should not be a substitute for missing empathy with people. Does that make sense?

  • enkers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Same, same. Whenever I go on YouTube on my phone, I always get slapped with at least one carcass ad. Like, no, thank you, I didn’t particularly want to see a mutilated animal corpse.

  • A_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hope it will be without suffering when I die someday. After that, if it made ecological sense, I wouldn’t mind if my body was eaten by whatever or whoever.
    Suffering is bad for all animals (including humans) so reduction of suffering is an important goal. Yet, nature doesn’t work toward this goal ; only humans (+some sentient beings?) do.
    Unfortunately, this is not the only goal we have to pursue.
    Would you mind being eaten ?