**You should reverse your concession, call for both a full investigation of criminal activity and demand hand recounts in all seven swing states.  **

In my professional view there are multiple and extremely clear indications the Presidential vote was willfully compromised.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    23 hours ago

    If this is so probable, why can’t I find any news source about this anywhere online other than here? Seems a little odd for someone to suggest the Election systems in swing states were compromises, and its only reported on this very obscure website.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Because the Dem leadership and the billionaire-owned media are too invested in the institutions of democracy to defend democracy itself by pointing out that those institutions broke under pressure from hostile actors that they treated as legitimate.

      Also, they’re probably worried that their reasonable inquiries based on actual reality will be equated with the fraudulent “stop the steal” AstroTurf campaign.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Doubt it, if there are credible claims of systemic access and manipulation of vote totals, people would be all over that shit. That’s not the same as claiming the vote was stolen, and then presenting zero evidence.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Doubt it, if there are credible claims of systemic access and manipulation of vote totals, people would be all over that shit

          Yeah, that’s what they said about all of Trump’s crimes too, but here we are…

          That’s not the same as claiming the vote was stolen, and then presenting zero evidence.

          I know. What I’m saying is that they’re using the risk of people impervious to evidence as lack of same accusing them as one of many excuses to not admit that the system they hold as more sacred than any ideal is broken and that they did a crappy job defending democracy.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Yeah, if there was anything to it they’d have their lawyers all over this. The result more or less matches the polling, and except for a few small incidents here and there, there were no issues.