• renou@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    the “CP” was a news article, but well…

    edit: ok, I stopped at “but well” but I didn’t know it’d get this much hate, my bad. All I wanted to say is that the guy shared a news article about an incident in the Philippines. In his replies, he also posted photos from a video related to the article. I don’t like it when I see Twitter screenshots in which the user changes the words to fit their claims. The post was subject to CSAM concerns along with the photos. So, it’s not explicitly “CP”, but it still violates the platform’s rules, and the guy should have remained suspended.

    • kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Think for a second. Why would he be specifically mentioning “those photos” if it was a news article?

      • Kalkaline @lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even if it was a news article, any half brained editor is going to know you don’t post CP because it’s illegal and you get the FBI breaking down your door and throwing you in a federal prison.

        • renou@feddit.ch
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          yea ik and I agree, he should’ve stayed suspended, he could’ve just wrote about it instead of sharing whatever he found. I just don’t like when the words changes from post to post or contexts are omitted when sharing.

          i realized my original comment is also missing a lot about what i wanted to say, but i got burned real quick lol.

      • renou@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        no I’m not denying it, just gave abit more context. Apparently it was a news article the post itself was also subject of the suspension and then there was the CSAM photos, not cp, but still worth getting banned for

        • hypelightfly@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          then there was the CSAM photos, not cp

          Those are the same thing. Child sexual abuse material is just a newer/better term for child porn as calling it porn is problematic.

          You aren’t adding any context, you’re (hopefully unintentionally) defending cp.

          • renou@feddit.ch
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh sorry, I’m maybe cofusing CSAM with something else, also I thought CP is when the act of sexual assault is explicitly shown in the said material, not just when the victim is shown in the crime location, like for example a photo that police or reporter might have taken from the crime scene and the victim

          • renou@feddit.ch
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            but if it’s the same thing how am i defending it, I don’t quite get it

            idk, if i call murder a homicide, am i defending murder?

            i’m not a native English speaker so I’d glad to know about these English synonyms

            • hypelightfly@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Murder and homocide are not the same thing where the terminology was changed from one to the other. Murder is only one type of homicide, there are others. CSAM is CP, literally the same thing.

              Pretending they aren’t and continuing to argue about it is defending it. Feel free to stop any time.

              • renou@feddit.ch
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Thanks for the clarification. It would’ve been also good if you could leave it at the explanation and not accusing me of more things. I genuinely didn’t know. But I guess it’s social media after all, internet points worth more.

      • MadMenace@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Those are just quotation marks. Air quotes are when you use your fingers to form quotation marks in the air.

        • johnthebeboptist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lol obviously, brainfart on my behalf. Is there a word for those kinds of sarcastic (for lack of a better word) quotes where it’s not just quoted, but implied to cast doubt on the original text/quote?

          • enkers@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean, no, you were right. That’s where in spoken conversation you would use air quotes, so it seems correct to use the term this way online too. Maybe writing “virtual air quotes” would help people who don’t understand that this is a text conversation, not literal speech?

      • renou@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        lol, I’m not doing that to defend anyone. It’s just to not accept every word comes out from that braindead bird app. correct word for what happened is CSAM not CP

          • renou@feddit.ch
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            hmm, like how? I don’t know the guy, It’s just what I gathered from both sides, those who cheered for the suspension and those who were against the suspension.