In the face of ‘eradication’, one trans activist is preparing to fight – and she’s sick of silence and neglect from her supposed allies. Raquel Willis tells Io Dodds why Republican bathroom bans are everybody’s problem

  • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Yes, the thing about FUD is you can’t stop it, and by fighting it you only make it worse, especially when there are legitimate reasons to doubt. The best response to FUD is to make the criticism look stupid by proving it wrong with action. Trying to shut down criticism makes you look weak, and makes the criticism seem more valid, even when it isn’t.

    • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      That doesn’t work in this scenario because democrats need more than the trans community to win elections. So they have to also win over voters that are anti trans.

      • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        So they have to also win over voters that are anti trans.

        And there it is. Let me ask you, how exactly do you think the Democrats should appeal to “anti-trans voters” without losing the trans and trans ally vote?

        • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          There’s no easy answer to that but until the trans community and their allies have a voting majority, it is a requirement that democrats appeal to both.

          • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 days ago

            You’re right that the answer isn’t easy, but there is one and the Democrats have known it for some time, they’re just not willing to do it. First, look at the driving force of anti-trans sentiment. It’s economics. Trump and the like redirect the righteous anger people feel about their economic situation towards minorities by creating a narrative that is easy to understand and plays into pre-existing prejudices. The Democrats could do the same thing but direct the anger towards the wealthy instead of minorities. People have pre-existing prejudices towards “elites,” and the narrative that the wealthy are the cause of your suffering has the advantage of being true. If the Democrats did this it wouldn’t matter if they also go to bat for the trans community, because the average “anti-trans voter” doesn’t actually care that much about trans issues, but are rather using the trans community as a stand-in to recieve their anger in the absence of a more compelling narrative.

            • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              5 days ago

              look at the driving force of anti-trans sentiment. It’s economics.

              Yeah, no. Economics isnt the driving force behind the anti-trans sentiment. That’s ridiculous

              • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 days ago

                It’s tied in to the broad cultural narrative that Republicans create and reinforce through their media, which is designed for the purpose of transforming economic anxiety into anger at minorities. The trans community can be said to be collateral, since the Republicans don’t directly (keyword here) blame them for the state of the economy, but they represent the perception of “elites” who are culturally strange and different. The entire conservative narrative is about making the economic cultural. Bigotry is deliberately fueled by displaced anger. The anger must come from somewhere.