• BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think the criticism is valid, not in favour of cars but in terms of future sustainability. Public transport infrastructure needs investment to keep it growing and improving. There is a risk with a free system that the focus in each budget is the battle around just covering the day to day costs, and the future investment gets put aside constantly as a problem for another day. This is typical behaviour of politicians, and makes the public transport organisations entirely dependent on politicians for their budget.

    However that problem applies to a lesser extent with systems that do get revenue from users, it’s just that they are less completely reliant on politicians and their yearly budgets. It’s ultimately all about political will and a willingness to prioritise transport investment over other public spending.

    I do think the scheme is a good thing, I’m just dubious that the political will to sustain it will persist long term. However hopefully this will spread to other European cities and whole countries and so become a normal idea alongside investment for future expansion and upgrades.

    • federal reverse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      What does the battle between investing in the future v. just keeping the day-to-day running have to do with whether the system is (part-)financed through tickets?

      I don’t see any connection, maybe even the inverse of what you say: Infrastructure needs long-term planning, and having a stable financial framework rather than fickle ticket sales is great for long-term planning.

    • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Good take. Agree completely.

      In more general terms, in a market-based society we tend to equate cost with value. For people who buy expensive watches the high price tag is a bonus. Artists seek sponsorship in the form of a Patreon subscription with supposed “perks” that give the buyer an impression of getting better value.

      The risk with “free stuff” will always be that it is perceived as having no value and treated accordingly.

    • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      That’s a good take, it’s obviously not perfect and could easily be derailed by shitty planning and politics. But it needs to be done and built upon to secure it in the long run.