- I usually code in Language or Script - Don’t we all? Amen. 
 
- Javascript is basically like Java but with some scripts in it - But what about script java? - That’s 𝒥𝒶𝓋𝒶. 
 
 
- I highly doubt anyone would guess ANSI C is what I’m talking about if I referred to it as C+ - The list shows TempleOS’s HolyC was known as C+ before. I am sure that is it 
 
- my main language is script java 
- It’s just C++ without templates. So whatever element you want to put into std::list, it must virtually inherit std::list::value_type. And of course there will be a macro-based list monstrosity inside Boost. - Types being declarable as virtual members is something I want to never hear again 
 
- c+=0.5 
- Language - I have job for you “language” programmers. - Requirements; -minimum 8 years of experiences Etc… 
- Holy-C used to be called C+, I think. 
- And C‡ is once again not included. For shame. 
- And then, comes ScriptJava 
- What kind of programming language is language? 
- Thats just HolyC before it became holy 
- lol it’s like c++ but we removed friend classes and other bullshit no one uses lol 
- It’s just C with a borrow checker. - Rust- 
 
- To be fair, compiling C code with a C++ compiler gets you all the warnings from C++'s strong-typing rules. That’s a big bonus for me, even if it only highlights the areas of your C that are likely to become a maintenance hazard - all those - void*casts want some documentation about what assumptions make them safe. Clang will compile variable-length arrays in C++, so you might want to switch off that warning since you’ve probably intended it. Just means that you can’t use designated initialisers, since C++ uses constructors for that and there’s no C equivalent. I’d be happy describing code that compiles in either situation as “C+”.- Also stops anyone using - auto,- constexpror- nullptras variable names, which will help if you want to copy-paste some well-tested code into a different project later.- Isn’t - autoa keyword in C?- It means something else. 
 
 












