• laxe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Vivaldi and Brave can modify Chromium to disable this feature. Chromium is open source after all.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      are they forks? That’s what I don’t get, who controls the merge controls into Chromium’s main branch? It’s open source, but who actually says yay or nay on PRs getting in? I assume it’s Google, and the others are all forks off, but if it makes it into the main branch or not will really decide if it gets adopted

      • erwan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can have your own set of patches (and/or config) and still stay up to date with upstream.

        You don’t need to do a hard fork to modify it for your needs.

    • Captain Beyond@linkage.ds8.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They can, but their very existence increases the Chromium engine’s market share and therefore Google’s control of the web, allowing them to do stuff like this. Once this is implemented in Chrome then these browsers will just become “Chrome but it can’t play netflix/access bank websites/etc” or whatever.

    • takeda@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Goggle standard approach to it, is to integrate it so much with other components that it will be a lot of work to disable it, eventually making it impractical.

      The right way would be for those clients to switch to gecko engine.

    • gnuplusmatt@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Brave calls itself a fork, which I suppose if its truly a fork, they are cherrypicking patches they can use from the chromium base, rather than recompiling with their own patch set on top