Summary

A heated CNN interview saw Trump adviser Stephen Miller lose his composure while defending government job cuts and Elon Musk’s role in DOGE.

Host Brianna Keilar pressed Miller on the chaotic termination and reinstatement of 300 nuclear agency employees, leading him to angrily demand why she wasn’t “celebrating” government cuts.

Keilar urged him to “calm down.”

The White House later claimed that Musk is not an employee or administrator of DOGE but serves only as a senior adviser to Trump.

  • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    180
    ·
    2 days ago

    “I would say that it’s pretty standard when you’re downsizing government, you make cuts, you assess those cuts. You see who needs to be rehired, you see who needs to be kept, who needs to be reevaluated.”

    Um… It’s standard to fire them and then decide if you should have fired them? That is truly moronic. I just don’t understand how I can think less of these people every time I hear them speak. Is there no bottom? Will they always be able to disappoint me no matter how little I think of them?

    • Lasherz12@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      2 days ago

      Unfortunately no, fascism has no bottom because its existence relies on digging. If they stop radically altering things then their populist facade would collapse. This is why they need new enemies every month and their rhetoric has to get more extreme every time they talk. Miller has always been the most extreme person in both admins though, so you can safely assume that he’s where they will be in about a month.

    • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s the tried and tested Elon Musk method of performance evaluation. Fire all the workers, then be shocked when they don’t want their old job back for a lower wage and worse contract terms

      • Sinthesis@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yep. Delete requirements. If you didnt have to put any requirements back, you didnt delete enough.

        This works well when designing a rocket but not very well when youre talking about human resources.

        • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Even with rockets the sane approach would be to model the outcome in a simulation or at a small scale, not “remove the outer hull and put her in orbit”.

    • easydnesto@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      All the CEO’s and consulting firms know that it’s standard practice to fire your highly experienced and highly paid workforce and hire undergrads at 1/3rd the cost to save money. That is this lunatic’s mind set of how to run this country. It surely couldn’t backfire could it? /s

  • Death__BySnuSnu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    2 days ago

    Perhaps he’s too emotional to be placed into a position of power. We don’t want him making decisions while in a hysterical outburst.

    • NotLemming@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I really feel that its best to put him somewhere he can have a real rest, and maybe we can give him a little cut to help with those overactive hormones.

      • Cort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        give him a little cut to help with those overactive hormones.

        Blood letting? Why not give this leech some leech friends?

        • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          It sounds like they mean a certain procedure that’s done to animals that cuts them off from the influence of hormones.

          In case that’s too vague:

          I think they’re referring to castration

  • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is Miller’s go-to when he doesn’t want to talk about what’s being discussed. He goes on a hyperbolic rant tangential to the topic to get the other party to ask him to calm down then address his rant.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      If it were me, and my show, I would mute him immediately when he started that. I would say, “This is an interview, not a pulpit, not an editorial. I will not allow any guest to take over my show to force their unfiltered messaging over my questions. If anyone gets to editorialize on my show, it is me. And here are the facts as I see them.”

      And then I would list all of the questions he failed to answer, fact check the ones he did, and then draw my own conclusions based on those lies and evasion, and I would do it all while his stupid face screams ineffectually into the camera, completely silently, until he stormed off in anger. Then I would plaster the stupidest, maddest face he had made in the frame instead for the remainder of my monologue.

    • blattrules@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      hyperbolic rant tangential to the topic to get the other party to ask him to calm down then address his rant

      That’s the long way of saying he turns into a little removed.

  • satans_methpipe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    That was super difficult to watch.

    This full grown man grins like he ate a turd after each condescending derailment attempt. Then he curls his bottom lip in a snarl to show his teeth.

    He always appeared weak and frightened, but holy crap does this amplify that weakness.

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why not celebrate government cuts? Because all the countries in the world where the standard of living is the best have a strong public service managing social programs!

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Id love some cuts to the surveillance state. I bet if we cut their money we could put it into feeding our hungry and helping our disabled live their best lives.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Like I just argued with some brain rot over:

      If these cuts are saving so much money, why not use it to fund UBI? If you actually believe their numbers they could have just made a $25k yearly UBI with cash left over.

      So why are they floating the idea of a $5k one time payment instead?

  • Jagger2097@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    https://youtu.be/OkvGLIO01zs

    It’s really not that interesting. I was hoping for saliva to be flying, but that just his tone all the time. He always sounds like the least interesting Housewife, hoping that being removed enough will keep her on the next season.

  • breen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Holy moly, this Stephen Miller guy is an idiot! Feels like an overexcited toddler with too much juice trying to tell his mom about the last episode of Dog the Bounty Hunter.