As a non-binary person, I often get asked, upon stating my gender identity, this question: “Are you AMAB or AFAB?”, and quite frankly, I hate it, and I think it reeks of bad intentions. Now, I don’t think anyone who asks this is explicitly enbyphobic. There’s a good chance that they just simply might not understand, but to me, at the end of the day, it reeks of the toxic mentality that assigned sex at birth is a “trait” or a “state of being”. I don’t see it that way. As someone who is 23 years old, my assigned sex at birth is an event that happened 23 years ago and has no bearing on any inherent part of who I am in the present moment.
This is also why I always speak in past tense for these matters. For example, I never say things like “I’m AMAB”, and I feel repulsed in those insane contexts where AMAB and AFAB are used as nouns (like someone saying “I have a question for all the AFABs here” just disgusts me). I always explicitly say, in my context, “I WAS assigned male at birth”, and I leave it at that. If you’re non-binary yourself and prefer to handle these matters differently, that’s okay, as long as you’re not projecting that I should go along with your view of this subject. I just like to emphasize that, for me, it’s really contingent on context when it comes to how willing I am to state my assigned sex at birth.
The caveat is that, in most of these instances, people are not directly asking me what sex I was assigned at birth. Let me give you a few examples:
- I take hormones, right? If someone wants to ask me about my experiences for whatever good faith reason like relating to it or just wanting more information in order to be supportive of my transition journey, then that’s totally fine. With this in mind, people won’t ask me things like “Are you AMAB or AFAB?”, but instead, will ask me things like “Are you taking estrogen, or are you taking testosterone?” which I find significantly more acceptable.
- If you’re my doctor, and you need to know something that pertains to my reproductive system, reproductive capacity, general anatomy/physiology, or any other thing that makes knowing my assigned sex at birth crucial to know, then I don’t mind the doctor asking obviously. Like I said, though, often times, a doctor won’t ask me things like “Are you AMAB or AFAB?”, obviously. They will ask me things like “Do you have a prostate? Can you get pregnant? Can you impregnate others?” and all that stuff that makes the contextual aspect of it all the more sensible.
- For people interested in me in a sexual context who find it hard to assume my assigned sex at birth because of my androgynous gender presentation, asking me “Do you have a penis or a vagina?” makes sense, especially if I indicated reciprocating sexual interest here. In these contexts, knowing my genital configuration would be important to know how to proceed with me in a sexual manner. However, let me clarify that not all non-binary people who were assigned male at birth have penises and not all non-binary people who were assigned female at birth have vaginas.
- The last point I’d state is to make sense of some more niche contexts here. For example, I talk about how short I am all the time, right? I stand at a height of 5’5", which by the standard of an adult cisgender woman, is generally not considered short. If I claim I am short at my height of 5’5", sometimes I like to clarify that, even though I’m non-binary, I was assigned male at birth to make it make sense when I’m on a forum or community for vertically challenged individuals like myself.
At the end of the day, I just like to sniff out context. I hate to be pedantic, but whenever someone asks me things like “AMAB or AFAB?” and leads it on with the fact that they’re “just curious”, I question the “why” of their curiosity. As I see it, unless the context indicates it being relevant, it shouldn’t be taken as an important matter. It seems like a fishy tactic incorporated by those with a bioessentialist mindset to tie my assigned sex as a trait and pick out what my “true gender” is rather than accepting me as non-binary at face value. Like I said to start, many people who ask this are not doing so in bad faith. Often times, they’re just misinformed, so I try to explain to them some of the more problematic aspects of said questions being asked in unnecessary, irrelevant contexts.
You must log in or # to comment.
I avoid telling people my AGAB, because if I do they instantly want to classify me as a gender I’m not. It’s clear that many people, even those who are queer themselves, see and use “AFAB enby” to mean “cis woman-lite” and “AMAB enby” to mean “cis man-lite”.
I’m an aphorian, none of my genders are man or woman. I may have some genders that are similar or proximal to those two, but they are still distinct genders.
I don’t want to be associated with or read as a man nor as a woman; and when people ask for my agab, they’re mostly asking to know how to binarise me “correctly”
I work in medicine and the idea that sex assigned at birth is relevant to patient care is actually a fundamental misunderstanding of the current state of transgender science. The entirety of information a doctor needs to correctly treat a patient in a medical context are the following:
- An organ inventory
- Hormone lab panels & list of current/historical medications
Unfortunately, many clinical professionals are unaware of how this is the total sum of everything they need to know. They are misinformed in their beliefs that certain labs which have different reference values based on sex and do not know that it is actually a reflection of hormone profiles of the patient. For example, hematocrit labs have different reference ranges that are often attributed to sex. However, studies on hematocrit labs in transgender patients reveal that being on hormones for a reasonable period of time (3-6 months or longer) will move a patient to the reference range typically associated with the gender they identify as. If you take this a step further, it’s actually a pure function of the circulating levels of estrogen and testosterone (among other factors) and even for cisgender folks having reference ranges set by these hormones is of more use, especially when dealing with folks at times of life when these values change (postmenopausal cisgender women and elderly cisgender men both have drastic changes in hormones which affect hematocrit and are currently unaccounted for) and would more accurately reflect the diversity we have in biology.The idea of sex essentialism deriving from one of chromosomal differences is actually a fundamental misunderstanding of how biological processes work. For those who find this to far a jump to take, I would point you towards studying what happens early in human development. When we are still forming as humans in the womb of our mother, there’s a period of time which sex is not differentiated. This is a direct reflection of hormones and bodily functions. Even among folks who posses XY or XX on the chromosome we most associate with sex, there are notable differences in biological functions which result in different outcomes for the developing fetus. We took shortcuts by associating these changes broadly with sex for a variety of reasons (namely it’s the most pertinent and strongest predictor) but it is a jump in logic and an inference about a complicated multi-lever process where many levers are typically influenced by a few key factors. If we wish to move into a world of personalized medicine and to further our understanding of all biological processes we need to challenge and throw out many of these assumptions to do so.
Thank you, you’ve given me a really fun topic to bring up when we see a bunch of my family in a few weeks (several of them are doctors and nurses). I wonder if other hormonally regulated ranges normalize in similar timelines even if the ranges are further apart in the segment of the population that has been measured, or if there’s a greater period of “in between ranges” in those cases. (I’m unfamiliar with the difference in ranges in your given example, and frankly others too. There’s a reason I’m not in the medical field.)
Again, thank you.
My AGAB is important to me because the way I was raised has shaped my experiences and personality. Although I am transitioning, I identify more with the AFAB experience in certain ways, so there are certain things I feel more comfortable bonding over with AFAB people. I’m also new to transitioning, so I am very curious about others’ experiences.
I do respect the views of people who don’t want to identify at all with their AGAB, and it’s perfectly ok to say that you don’t want to share that information if people ask. I appreciate the tip to ask about hormones instead, and I’ll try to do that in the future in order to be more respectful.
There is no universal “AFAB experience”, especially in relation to being trans. A trans man and a cis woman are both AFAB, but their experiences in relation to that fact are wildly different. I also don’t conflate assigned sex at birth with experience (to a large degree) and personality (to no degree at all). I think, depending on how you transition, this is less so about identifying with being “AFAB” and more so about identifying with transmasculine (if you identify with that term), but I’m not one to speak on your experience and how that manifests for you, so correct me if I’m wrong.
There’s no universal experience, but it’s more like an umbrella term, a sort of fundamental experience that most can relate to. I personally don’t believe my experience to be wildly different from that of cis women, other than that I have also suffered from dysphoria. I typically identify even more closely with transmasc people. It is ok to disagree with me, but I do believe our upbringing and experiences shape our personalities, and that if I was socialized male from birth that I would have different experiences, thus a somewhat different personality.
And that’s the problem. It’s not universal, and at the end of the day, that’s why it differs for me. Something that someone can tie to “AFAB socialization” could easily apply to AMAB people in a lot of instances, for example. My main issue with the “AFAB/AMAB” shit is that it’s used to create a new binary, and enables people to misgender non-binary people because they see non-binary as “cis+” or something like that. As a non-binary person who explicitly wants nothing to do with the notion that I could be cis, this is what gets me the most. I assume bad faith in a lot of people, so anyone who asks me “AMAB or AFAB? I just want to know your socialization!”, yeah I don’t trust them either.
I agree with pretty much everything you said. I will say I don’t get too bothered by cis people asking me my AGAB, like of course I’d much rather they not but that question is pretty low on the “silly cis bullshit” scale. Like at least they’re somewhat acknowledging that I am not a man.
What does bother me is non-binary people in queer spaces who bring it up when the info isn’t relevant. The number of posts I saw on queer Reddit which started with “I identify as non-binary (AGAB)”, and it’s just like, why?
As someone who is 23 years old, my assigned sex at birth is an event that happened 23 years ago and has no bearing on any inherent part of who I am in the present moment.
This is the only thing I disagree with, really. Obviously your AGAB shouldn’t be a defining factor of your personality (whether you’re trans or cis, tbh), but to discount it wholly seems a bit much. The toys I played with as a kid. Which kids were allowed for sleepovers, and which ones I was “supposed” to develop crushes on. Which types of expression were socially acceptable. The kinds of trauma I’ve had. My journey to discovering my gender. All of these would have been pretty different if I had been assigned another gender at birth, and they all play a role in the person I have become. Ultimately I agree that’s it’s simply an event, but it’s one which regrettably still has a vast influence on how society treats you during your developmental years.
What you’re doing is the “socialization” argument here. Socialization isn’t universal on the basis of assigned sex at birth. Also, I don’t “disregard” it wholly. I just take it at face value. Assigned sex at birth is literally just that: assigned sex at birth, and I’ve even emphasized things like transition journey being relative to my assigned sex at birth with content like the very first bullet point in the post. It truly is just an event.
“Socialized male” ≠ AMAB
“Having a penis” ≠ AMAB
“Presenting masculine” ≠ AMAB
I could go on and on.
I think you’re dismissing their point too readily. It’s true that there’s nothing I share with every other afab person on the planet other than a box that got ticked by looking at our genitals when we were born, but if I’m looking for someone who shares a particular gendered experience, my best bet is probably another transmasculine person, particularly one who transitioned at a similar age. It’s reductionist and transphobic to argue that one’s socialisation is determined by gender assigned at birth, but it’s also reductionist to pretend it’s irrelevant.
And here’s the problem. I’m dismissing their point yes, but I do the same thing as you. I participate in a lot of spaces with transfeminine people myself, including binary trans women and transfeminine non-binary people like me. This is from a pragmatic perspective, though. If I want to learn more about feminizing effects of estrogen, then talking to AFAB trans people won’t be very helpful in comparison to talking to AMAB trans people about it.
This aspect of relating to trans people who share your assigned sex has nothing to even do with my initial response to their original comment. It was about the problematic description of “socialization”. I don’t argue that assigned sex at birth is irrelevant to socialization myself. I argue that it’s abused with transphobic intentions. As a matter of fact, the entirety of my post was to emphasize that people pry about assigned sex all the time in irrelevant matters. Funnily enough, in my original post, I didn’t even mention socialization. There is a major difference between saying “I want to interact with fellow AMAB trans people to relate my experience transitioning better” and doing things like I’ve mentioned in the post like “I want to ask enbies their assigned sex and intrude on their personal boundaries because I’m enbyphobic and don’t accept them for who they are.”, but people still get upset over this.
It’s very apparent that, even non-binary people themselves, engage in the “misgendering but woke” shit a lot. There are non-binary people who will separate non-binary people by assigned sex at birth, and this isn’t jack shit to do with socialization either. They do it because of internalized enbyphobia that usually comes with a side of sexism as well.
If you want to make your assigned sex at birth a part of who you are, I won’t stop you, but to me, I’m not comfortable doing it. Being comfortable with your assigned sex is literally just what being cis is, and I’m not even remotely cis.
I agree that gender-based socialization isn’t universal, but the upbringing of children is still overwhelmingly based on cisheteronormative gender norms in most of society.
I suspect we might be having a semantic disagreement, since I’d typically use “socialized male” and “AMAB” pretty interchangeably. Maybe I should start using “AMABBAABOTTMLBVPWWM” which stands for “assigned male at birth but also a bunch of times throughout my life by various people who were mistaken” :P
It is semantic, yes. I disagree on “AMAB” and “socialized male” being interchangeable, and like I said, nothing is really universal in that context either. Different AMAB individuals get socialized differently, even in the context of gender, especially in relation to their circumstances in other ways.
