/home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-29 days agoThe Pebble Has Been Brought Backstore.repebble.comexternal-linkmessage-square143fedilinkarrow-up1485arrow-down117file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1468arrow-down1external-linkThe Pebble Has Been Brought Backstore.repebble.com/home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-29 days agomessage-square143fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squaren2burns@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·9 days agoYour response says, “not epaper” which is categorically wrong. I assume you meant to say “eink”
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·9 days agoAs I mentioned earlier, whether a screen type is considered e-paper is subjective. And in my opinion, reflective LCD isn’t a type of e-paper. You may disagree, but it’s not “categorically” wrong.
Your response says, “not epaper” which is categorically wrong. I assume you meant to say “eink”
As I mentioned earlier, whether a screen type is considered e-paper is subjective. And in my opinion, reflective LCD isn’t a type of e-paper. You may disagree, but it’s not “categorically” wrong.