In an experiment, one tube produced 440 microwatts. When the researchers used four tubes at once, they could power 12 LEDs for 20 seconds.
In an experiment, one tube produced 440 microwatts. When the researchers used four tubes at once, they could power 12 LEDs for 20 seconds.
The article is talking about an entirely different way to generate electricity from water
Others have explained why this is inefficient and useless elsewhere in the thread, I suggest looking at those conversations.
Charge separation is a real thing. It’s the opposite of how an LED works. It’s not very efficient in that direction, but it’s real.
It works with electrons being excited by photons, though.
What that has to do with the interface of water and air, I can’t figure out.
third paragraph:
charge separation is a lot more than just photoinduced charge separation
If that was a real thing, at least in charges strong enough to harness for work, surely we wouldn’t ground sensitive electronics to metal water pipes. And metal fuel containers would be spontaneously exploding all the time. I can’t find any evidence of this phenomenon anywhere but in this article. Can you provide a source?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triboelectric_effect#Liquids_and_gases
Since triboelectricity requires asperities, I would guess the interiors of such containers are smoothed out. It’s also not unheard of for fuel containers to spontaneously explode when they fall, and movies that often happens when they smash against the ground.
Huh. TIL. Neat!