DISCLAIMER: this is not my content that was removed, I just came across it in the modlog and found it to be absurd. If it’s not allowed, I totally understand.

Reason removed was because it’s unrelated.

Unrelated……

The guy was illegally deported without due process. And yet for some reason, suggesting so is somehow “unrelated” to a meme that is trying to say that because he is affiliated (no charges were ever filed against him for gang-related activity) with a gang, he is by default, guilty.

What’s ironic, is that the entire point of the meme is that the bullshit about him being in MS-13 is unrelated to the fact that people want accountability for this administration illegally deporting a man without due process.

This mod has definitely chosen the correct name.

And even taken into consideration that the instance is essentially a troll haven for wayward 4Chan refugees, they should still have to adhere to the rules of common sense.

  • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I mean, at least they finally admitted the withholding status was granted

    I’ve never said that it wasn’t. I’ve said many times that he had a withholding status, but that it doesn’t matter due to the invocation of the illegal alien act.

    Even the “I don’t know what site that is”

    So it’s impossible for a person to not know exactly who owns or runs a site that showed up on google? You guys can’t be serious lol. Again - the site does not matter if what they are reporting is verifiably true, which it was. What exactly is the issue with the site that I linked? Neither of you have actually pointed that out lol

    when we provide actual court documents

    Court documents that say the exact thing you’re saying they DON’T say lol.

    You: “Waaaah no judges said he is an MS-13 member, here’s the proof!”

    Also You: links to legal documents that mention multiple times that 2 judges determined him to be an MS-13 gang member

    lol

    • flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Shit, I didn’t think you had problems with reading comprehension. Sorry, let me be clearer.

      When I said, “consider this my reply also,” it meant “I’m no longer interested in talking to you.”

      When I said, “Not worth my effort,” it meant “I’m no longer interested in talking to you.”

      And for perfect clarity, when I say, “I’m no longer interested in talking to you,” I mean, “I know you’re going to reply because you’re that type, but I’m no longer interested in talking to you.” This is my last reply to you.

      It’s cool. I have a learning disability, too. Glad I could help. Have a good one.

      • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        When I said, “consider this my reply also,” it meant “I’m no longer interested in talking to you.”

        When I said, “Not worth my effort,” it meant “I’m no longer interested in talking to you.”

        That doesn’t mean I’m not going to reply to you. I’m going to reply to your post, and it’s up to you if you want to reply again or not. You said you wouldn’t - that’s fine with me…yet here you are :)

        You don’t get to choose when I stop replying to you, I do. Just don’t reply if you don’t want to :)

        I have a learning disability

        Clearly. Good on you for being upfront about it.