Of course constitution isn’t final, for example if 70% of people one day say they reject the constitution.
Still while constitution is in force and separation of power exists, even government lead by hindutwa fundamentalists with popular support in a country where most if not almost all think religion is super important, can’t dare go against constitution and change it to their liking (it needs 2/3 majority and still most fundamental aspects are immutable). Compare this to the mess the idiot US president is making. To do something similar the Indian government needs to make clever acts, to find loopholes and to abuse detective agencies.
The most dangerous thing going against the constitutional nature is UAPA which is a sedition act and is very much abused.
Of course constitution isn’t final, for example if 70% of people one day say they reject the constitution.
Still while constitution is in force and separation of power exists, even government lead by hindutwa fundamentalists with popular support in a country where most if not almost all think religion is super important, can’t dare go against constitution and change it to their liking (it needs 2/3 majority and still most fundamental aspects are immutable). Compare this to the mess the idiot US president is making. To do something similar the Indian government needs to make clever acts, to find loopholes and to abuse detective agencies.
The most dangerous thing going against the constitutional nature is UAPA which is a sedition act and is very much abused.