• SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Probably not that different, honestly. The seeds of today’s fascist outbreak were already firmly planted by then. It was such a close election in 2000, it’s quite likely he’d have lost to a charismatic opponent in 2004 over discontent with Democrats or green policy. (An echo of either George Bush’s loss in 1992, or Jimmy Carter’s loss in 1980.) Don’t forget that our current President first ran in 2000; if Dubya hadn’t been riding high on incumbent advantage and 9/11 patriotism, there’s a chance he might have run again in 2004. With the stochastic nature of events, we could’ve been in this situation years earlier, too.

    • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      6 hours ago

      If his win was recognized. He probably won Florida, but they never let the hand recount he was ahead in finish.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Jan 6th was the second recent coup attempt in the US. The Brooks Brothers Riot was the first, and it was successful.

      • bassomitron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Such a fucked up situation. I like to imagine that another timeline had him become president and our government pivoted to seriously focusing more on combating climate change and pressuring the rest of the world to step up. It’s not an amazing timeline, but it’s one where the world isn’t facing imminent collapse of countless ecosystems and fascism didn’t take over the US.

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    And your decision to surrender the 2000s to Bush is what got us here, all because you didn’t want to go against the norms.

    • ysjet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      More specifically, he didn’t want to allow the precedent of allowing the supreme Court to simply arbitrarily pick the president if the Republicans whined enough, which is what was happening.

      Good thought, bad execution.