In its submission to the Australian government’s review of the regulatory framework around AI, Google said that copyright law should be altered to allow for generative AI systems to scrape the internet.

  • nightmaaaare@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Personally I’d rather stop posting creative endeavours entirely than simply let it be stolen and regurgitated by every single company who’s built a thing on the internet.

    • AbsolutelyNotABot@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the topic is more complex than that.

      Otherwise you could say you’d rather stop posting creative endeavours entirely than simply let it be stolen and regurgitated by every single artist who use internet for references and inspiration.

      There’s not only the argument “but companies do so for profit” because many artist do the same, maybe they are designers, illustrators or other and you’ll work will give them ideas for their commissions

        • AbsolutelyNotABot@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          let people reuse each other’s melodies

          I think this is an interesting example, because it’s already like this. Songs reusing other sampled songs are released all the time, and it’s all perfectly legal. Only making a copy is illegal. No one can sue you if you create a character that resembles mickey mouse, but you can’t use mickey mouse.

          And pharmaceutical patents serves the same scope, they encourage the company to release publicly papers, data and synthesis methods so that other people can learn and research can move faster.

          And the whole point of this is exactly regulating AI like people, no one will come after you because you’ve read something and now you have an opinion about it, no body will get angry if you’ve saw an Instagram post and now you have some ideas for your art.

          Of course the distinction between likeness and copy is not that defined, but that’s part of the whole debacle

    • Roundcat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just take comfort in the fact that my art will never be good enough for a generative Ai to steal.

      • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If it’s on any major platform, these companies will probably still use it since I doubt at that point if they were allowed to scrape the whole internet they’d have any human looking over the art used.

        It’ll just be thrown in with everything else similar to how I always seem to find paper towels in the dryer after doing laundry.