In its submission to the Australian government’s review of the regulatory framework around AI, Google said that copyright law should be altered to allow for generative AI systems to scrape the internet.

  • Gutless2615@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not turning copyright law on its head, in fact asserting that copyright needs to be expanded to cover training a data set IS turning it on its head. This is not a reproduction of the original work, its learning about that work and and making a transformative use from it. An AI isn’t copying the original, its learning about the relationships that original has to the other pieces in the data set.

    • phillaholic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The lines between learning and copying are being blurred with AI. Imagine if you could replay a movie any time you like in your head just from watching it once. Current copyright law wasn’t written with that in mind. It’s going to be interesting how this goes.

      • jarfil@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Imagine if you could replay a movie any time you like in your head just from watching it once.

        Two points:

        1. These AIs can’t do that; they need thousands or millions of repetitions to “learn” the movie, and every time they “replay” the movie it is different from the original.

        2. “learning by rote” is something fleshbags can do, and are actually required to by most education systems.

        So either humans have been breaking the copyright all this time, or the machines aren’t breaking it either.

        • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well fleshbags have to pay several years worth of salary to get their education, so by your comparison, Google’s AI should too.

          • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Imagine thinking Public Education doesn’t count. Or that no one without a college degree ever invented anything useful. That’s before we get to your notion of “College SHOULD be expensive, for everyone, always”.

            The problem with education is NOT that some people pay less for theirs, or nothing at all, nor that some even have the audacity to learn quickly. AI could help everyone to have a chance to learn cheaply, even quickly.