Only in Trump’s America Shiloh Hendricks has raised over $180,000 after a video of her allegedly hurling racist phrases at a five-year-old child went viral. You can watch the video on Instagram www.instagram.com/… but beware, it is infuriating. She...
Removed by mod
Nope
It requires a declaration of war. Only Congress can do that.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/21
Furthermore, people being legally deported under that act have protections
Once all that has legally been done, the federal courts have final say.
So, this is all illegal, and you need to read up on things you no nothing about.
Removed by mod
Can you read?
The actual text, from the beginning:
Don’t come at me with opinions of meaning. I gave you the actual text.
It’s like talking to a brick wall with that one BTW lol
Fact. Or a troll
It’s been days with them, I think they are really like that. Now, I’m an obstinate mother fucker too, lol.
Fair lol. I’ve decided they are a troll, so I won’t feed them further.
Removed by mod
Let’s say that the trump admin is deporting gangs. Cool. Gangs are NOT NATIONS OR GOVERNMENTS.
love how you ignored the protections and jurisdictions bit…
Your still wrong.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Explain how your Mental gymnastics is twisting the literal text into something it’s not, and I’ll apologize. Give me a line by line of the actual text, not an interpretation. I came with facts. You’ve come with feelings.
You do realize I’m talking about the planes full of migrants deported without due process, not just one case, right?
Removed by mod
Yes, not at war, nor is there an invasion
Yes again, not at war, nor is there an invasion
Yes activist judges, like the ones who wanted him deported? Or are they only activist judges when it goes against your views?
Removed by mod
Yes the wartime Act? Is the us at war?
No i never said that hahahaha
Oh so, the stay of deportation was perfectly fine, not by an “activist” judge.
Removed by mod
It’s literally a wartime Act.
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/alien-enemies-act-explained
You should try googling sometime yourself.
Irrelevant when an activist president used a wartime Act outside of war.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
There isn’t an invasion or predatory incursions though, that’s just factual. Otherwise the president of El Salvador couldn’t have come to the us, as they are the “enemy” “invading”. That’s what you don’t seem to be understanding
Removed by mod
Yes And the precedent of is an incursion or predatory invasion are clear, what else is clear is that this situation is neither of those, so the act was used under false presences, so the president is, as per usual flaunting the rule of law, it was invoked incorrectly, and falsely, as there is no incursion or predatory invasion
Removed by mod
Yes? And did you keep reading? How those words are specifically used during wartime or invasion which this is clearly not?
Removed by mod
Kay cause clearly you didn’t.
Removed by mod
No, not according to me according to the real world and what’s happening
The president does have the power during wartime… which the president doesnt get to decide, congress does.