• Windex007@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    For what it’s worth, and maybe I’m naive, but I read that comment not about not meeting some criteria of what appears on a driver’s license… But instead rebuking the notion that JD has acted with the integrity required to achieve “manhood”.

    English has really massacred the ability to clearly articulate concepts around biology, identifying as a boy or girl, and then having lived in such a way to have “ascended” to “manhood/womanhood”.

    JD Vance is a boy if he says he’s a boy. Being a man isn’t so simple. I reject that he is a man.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ignoring the bit where they call him trans as an insult…

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah re-reading that line, I think you’re right that they intended “trans” to mean “masqueradeding as”.

        I agree with the sentiment, but you’re right, it’s not cool to use “trans” for that purpose. Thanks for poking me to more carefully consider how the word was used here.