Edit: And in the end, it’s back to good old Fedora with Xfce. I guess I’m an old man, fixed in my ways. Haiku was interesting, but not nearly as stable as needed. OpenSuSE with Xfce was rough, it requires more polish.

I’ve been a Fedora Linux user for a million years by now, and I haven’t touched any other OS (outside of Windows 10 and 11 at work).

Lately I got a refurbished ThinkCentre from ca 2018 (7th generation Intel i5, 16GB RAM, Intel HD 630). The initial idea was to use it as a media PC but the small form factor ended up not being small enough for my living room.

Now I’m thinking of using it as a desktop PC for a while, to see if it can make my laptop be a portable machine again instead of always plugged, always on. If it doesn’t work out, I’ll use it as a home server.

Since this is all an experiment, I want to give a new OS a shot before I settle for the familiar Fedora.

OpenSuSE is the first on my list, but even from the LiveUSB I noticed that the software selection is more limited than I’m used to.

I’m thinking of giving HaikuOS a shot as well.

What else has been going on in the world of free OSes since 2007? What’s one that you are excited about?

  • words_number@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Plain debian testing with the desktop of your choice (I like xfce). Rolling release, slightly newer packages than ubuntu, very stable and reliable, as minimalist and light weight as you want (depends on installation method).

  • FOSS Is Fun@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Personally I am excited for immutable distributions, so my suggestion would be Fedora Silverblue or Kinoite. It may be a spin of Fedora, but it works completely differently than regular Fedora. I am using it as my daily driver for over a year already and I am quite happy with it (apart from reoccurring breakages caused by kernel updates, e. g. my AMD desktop currently does not work with kernel 6.4 or newer, but this doesn’t have anything to do with Silverblue).

    There are other immutable distributions out there, e. g. Vanilla OS or openSUSE microOS, so if you really want to avoid Fedora, you could also choose trying out one of these. In the case of Vanilla OS I would wait until version 2 is out, because version 2 will be radically different from the first release.

    • agrammatic@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, that’s a great idea. The whole concept of immutable OSes passed me by - I’ve read the terms before at some point, but I have no idea how they work and which problems they solve. Definitely ideal candidates for my experiment.

  • beefcat@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Linux is UNIX made by people who hate Windows.

    FreeBSD is UNIX made by people who love UNIX.

    Give FreeBSD a shot.

    • Aatube@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m sorry what
      I’m not opposed to trying out FreeBSD but 1. Both aren’t Unix 2. Linux’s development has no more relation to Windows than BSD, I don’t see why you think FreeBSD loves Unix more. In fact you could fully say that macOS loves Unix more.

      • beefcat@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Relax buddy, it’s just a very old joke.

        FreeBSD absolutely is UNIX, it is descended from Berkeley Software Distribution, itself a descendant of UNIX 5.

        But the joke isn’t so much about the lineage of these operating systems, rather their design philosophy.