Peaces@infosec.pub to Politics@beehaw.org · 1 year agoConservative Case Emerges to Disqualify Trump for Role on Jan. 6www.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up17arrow-down1external-linkConservative Case Emerges to Disqualify Trump for Role on Jan. 6www.nytimes.comPeaces@infosec.pub to Politics@beehaw.org · 1 year agomessage-square12fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareupstream@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoImagine if we made new laws that evolved with the time and retired old laws that are clearly anachronistic? If instead of interpreting and discussing unclear text the legislators just said “we believe this is wrong, and thus - now we change it”.
minus-squarePeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoThat’s the job of Congress. But the Supreme Court can also down those laws too. That was what conservatives attempted with the Affordable Care Act .
minus-squareupstream@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year agoSorry if I was unclear; I was trying to say “imagine if you had a system that worked” 🫣 And I don’t mean that in any negative way, other than to say that the current system is visibly broken.
Imagine if we made new laws that evolved with the time and retired old laws that are clearly anachronistic?
If instead of interpreting and discussing unclear text the legislators just said “we believe this is wrong, and thus - now we change it”.
That’s the job of Congress.
But the Supreme Court can also down those laws too. That was what conservatives attempted with the Affordable Care Act .
Sorry if I was unclear; I was trying to say “imagine if you had a system that worked” 🫣
And I don’t mean that in any negative way, other than to say that the current system is visibly broken.