• mommykink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Did you read the title of this post? That’s exactly what’s being implied. If anything, you’re moving the goalposts in the discussion.

    • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, I gave you a concrete example of how we can also change the perverse incentives. Your insistence that the most plausible alternative is “forced quartering” is ridiculous.

      Also, stop using sock puppet accounts to upvote yourself and downvote me. There’s no way you posted a comment and someone instantly upvoted you 1 second later.

      • mommykink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re delusional lmao and your concrete example had no relevancy to my comment or the subject of this post

        • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          What don’t you understand? Homeowners now are financially incentivized to leave their homes empty. That doesn’t have to be the case. Literally no one except you is talking about “forced quartering”.