• jarfil@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can track engagement, and I can update them if need be

    That’s inherently bad as in:

    • Third party (you) tracking the user
    • Hiding the true target from the user
    • Destroying any attempt at content archival

    They’re not inherently bad “for you”, just for everyone else.

    • Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Third party (you) tracking the user

      I’m not tracking users, I’m tracking engagement. I’m not Zuckerberg

      Hiding the true target from the user

      99.99% of website use a reverse proxy, the target is nearly always hidden. I don’t think you understand how the internet works.

      Destroying any attempt at content archival

      Who would archive a shortened URL and not follow the link to its target? It’s not my fault if people don’t know how to archive my content.

      URL shorteners are not inherently bad.

    • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I see zero reason why others would be entitled to archive your content, nor hiding the true target from the user. Those are not bad things.