zik@aussie.zone to Science@beehaw.orgEnglish · edit-21 year agoLK-99 isn’t a superconductor — how science sleuths solved the mysterywww.nature.comexternal-linkmessage-square1fedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down10cross-posted to: StrangeTimes@kbin.socialtechnology@feddit.chtechnology@lemmy.worldscience@lemmy.mltechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up16arrow-down1external-linkLK-99 isn’t a superconductor — how science sleuths solved the mysterywww.nature.comzik@aussie.zone to Science@beehaw.orgEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square1fedilinkcross-posted to: StrangeTimes@kbin.socialtechnology@feddit.chtechnology@lemmy.worldscience@lemmy.mltechnews@radiation.party
minus-squareRentlar@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoA rare opportunity for a scientific story to have a proper beginning middle and end. I liked it even if it’s too bad LK-99 isn’t a superconductor, I was hopeful because of the relative ease of synthesis the result could be better checked.
A rare opportunity for a scientific story to have a proper beginning middle and end. I liked it even if it’s too bad LK-99 isn’t a superconductor, I was hopeful because of the relative ease of synthesis the result could be better checked.