fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 12 days agoResourcesmander.xyzimagemessage-square263linkfedilinkarrow-up1878arrow-down146
arrow-up1832arrow-down1imageResourcesmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 12 days agomessage-square263linkfedilink
minus-squareflamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down7·11 days agoBut image if we can provide so much for 8.5 billion, it means we can provid double for 4 billion. There is no reasonable excuse to keep increasing the human population.
minus-squaregandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·11 days agonumbers must go up
minus-squarerainwall@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down9·11 days agoThose 8.5 billion are producing all of that 100%. If you had 4 billion, it would be 45%.
minus-squareEq0@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down1·11 days agoProduction is absolutely not the bottleneck, here. We are producing too much, constantly.
But image if we can provide so much for 8.5 billion, it means we can provid double for 4 billion. There is no reasonable excuse to keep increasing the human population.
numbers must go up
Those 8.5 billion are producing all of that 100%. If you had 4 billion, it would be 45%.
Production is absolutely not the bottleneck, here. We are producing too much, constantly.