389aaa [it/its]

  • 0 Posts
  • 29 Comments
Joined 6 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 31st, 2020

help-circle

  • Thank you for typing this all up, it makes me feel like I’m losing it how nobody seems to be bothered with this at all.

    I’m newly in the same age range and it’s baffling to me how the ‘real adult’ cultural age marker seems to be a target that’s constantly just out of reach. I’m honestly concerned people will start thinking anyone below 30 is a child and should thereby have no rights, at this point.



  • 389aaa [it/its]@hexbear.nettoChapotraphouse@hexbear.netKarl Marx on AI
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    29 days ago

    You can’t just deny reality because it doesn’t suit your opinions.

    There are, in fact, a lot of anti-AI people who are familiar with the technology and have used it and maybe even still use it while absolutely hating it and wanting the technology destroyed.

    People do, in fact, have their own reasons. Not everyone worships productivity. Many people acknowledge the usefulness of this technology and still reject it for the cultural, artistic, and cognitive impacts.




  • 389aaa [it/its]@hexbear.nettoChapotraphouse@hexbear.netKarl Marx on AI
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    This is a hilarious strawman by the way. You’re right there’s a number of people who’ve never tried it but to imply that ALL those who are anti-AI have never engaged with it hilarious.

    I have spent hours and hours of my life engaging with these stupid machines and trying to get myself to like them because I know they’re only going to get more everywhere over time and it’s obviously bad for my mental health to fucking hate this stupid fucking technology so much, I know they are in fact useful for a ton of shit, hell, I’ve even begrudgingly used them to dig through erratz unorganized databases many times.

    I still fucking hate them, and I still do not think the technology is in any way worth the negative effects on cognition, society, the arts, and human culture as a whole.




  • 389aaa [it/its]@hexbear.nettoChapotraphouse@hexbear.netKarl Marx on AI
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    29 days ago

    People don’t want this shit because they’re fundamentally disgusted by it and see it as immoral and inhuman. (Correctly.)

    You’re going to have to wait for the generation of people who grew up with this to be culturally ascendent for your stupid scolding nonsense to work, and god willing by that time we’ll all be long dead.


  • In fairness to cursive, some kind of cursive was the standard form of handwriting for basically all English writings up until probably the 2000s - it is legitimately very useful for anyone who might have to dig through old documentation or letters. And handwriting is an important skill to build, cognitively speaking, it has lots of second order benefits.

    Definitely a less important skill than ability to actually understand computers, these days, but it does have its uses and if everybody forgot how to do it a lot of old stuff would suddenly require specialists to decipher - we’re basically halfway there already, people of my generation often have to kick cursive up to older people because we were never taught it.


  • The O9A as far as I’m aware has zero FBI connections originally, it was started by a genuine Nazi occultist British crank.

    What you’re thinking of is the Tempel Ov Blood (Yes that’s how it’s spelled) which is essentially the American denomination of the O9A who have their own modified version of the theology and all that shit.

    The founder of that IS a known FBI informant, though I believe he became an informant after founding the TOB.

    I unfortunately know a lot about these groups.

    764 is technically a separate group that’s really just in it for the pedophilia, little Epsteins, but in practice there is A LOT of overlap.




  • Yes, at bare minimum I agree with you - I am bigender myself, by the way, though definitely a trans woman first - but overall when picturing the whole situation it really seems to me like she was partially in the closet, the fact that she was in the military and was raised in a weird christian cult makes that idea, at least to all the trans women I’ve personally told about this, even more clear and obvious.

    Obviously there’s no smoking gun, but I think there is more than enough reason to come to that conclusion on her. Some of the strong pushback here is probably because, even if she was just genderqueer or non-physically-transitioning bigender or whatever, it seems very clear to me that most of the people (not you) arguing strongly against this in this thread are never calling to call her a her or call her Lilly and are arguing this point as an excuse to continue using he/him and ‘Aaron’ exclusively. Whether they know that or not, as internalized transmisogyny is quite rampant.


  • One can engage in transphobic behavior without being transphobic as a person. As I said, internalized transmisogyny is not uncommon.

    For the record, every single trans woman I’ve ever told about Lilly’s accounts and situation immediately identified her as a trans woman that was partially in the closet, as is very common for us especially when we’re in situations where we cannot feasibly transition.



  • Okay I know it’s weird to reply to a comment after 2 years, but I actually have an answer for this now.

    According to a friend of mine with EDS, she thinks it’s very likely I have something similar going on, though maybe at a subclinical level. One of the lesser known effects of that is temperature sensitivity, so, that’s probably part of the puzzle in my case.

    Caveat - I haven’t been able to find a doctor for a while, so I haven’t actually been subject to any examination or diagnosis.



  • It is significantly more likely that under a scenario wherein Trump pulls a coup, things are going to get DRAMATICALLY worse domestically for marginalized populations in America.

    Especially Hispanic populations and trans women, like myself. I personally would greatly prefer to not be shoved in a concentration camp or shot in the street, even if destabilizing America would be best for the world at large.

    I know you’re probably going to say that both sides are the same, but at this point it’s very obvious that Trump and company have their foot on the gas in a way the Democrats frankly never would. If we’re talking an actual coup wherein rule of law is completely dissolved, then I am fucked, all of my loved ones are fucked, and we will die horrible deaths at a quite young age.

    Hell, for many of us we wouldn’t have even gotten the chance to be happy before that.

    So yes, things would in fact be very different and that is an outcome worth avoiding if at all possible.