I understand what that is supposed to mean

It seems like your understanding is different from other people’s.

A single user making dozens of posts and rarely getting any response? I wouldn’t call that egregious, it just seems ineffective to me.

It’ll be easier to build an engine that’s powered by steam. But the hard part is the generator, you’re going to need to make some magnets.

<div style="width: 100%">This meets the spec if the only requirement is that it's centered.<\div>

Wireless is also critical, but I’m starting to think your confusion is more around grammar than technology.

Underwater cables being used for parts of the internet is not the same thing as “internet means wires.”

I love my pets… But no matter how well I take care of them, they’re still gross. Still love them, though.

You mean the tool in Photoshop?

/s

The problem isn’t on the PC side, though. It’s on the side of the device that has to choose between host or device. The PC is always a host, so special support in UEFI isn’t needed.

Yeah, that sounds right.

The USB protocol and UEFI aren’t a problem, but Android/iOS might be. I’ve booted various PCs from a raspberry pi (USB-OTG), but the last time I tried to boot an iso from my android phone I couldn’t get it to work. It’s been a while so I can’t remember exactly what the issue was.

I’m sorry that’s been your experience, but my comments have been in the context of the OOP, which is very different from what you just described.

Why not focus on policies instead of labels? If you must apply a label, I’m sure you can find something that’s understood by the person you’re talking to. Someone who’s right-leaning might prefer the term “America first” (as in, American citizens before big business). Know your audience.

Okay, but why is terminology so important here? If you could achieve your other goals easier by compromising on terminology, why wouldn’t you?

That’s not quite right. Projectors make headlights less blinding. It would be worse if we still used basic reflectors. Also, not all vehicles use expensive LED headlights.

Back to your original argument: you aren’t saying you think an IR HUD would be less complicated than a cheap halogen bulb in a projector, are you? Because that would be rediculous.

There’s a lot more that goes into to than you think. A camera and HUD will never be as cheap as a bulb and a reflector.

Of course the cost would come down (slightly) if a new tech goes mainstream, but you don’t think an IR HUD could become as cheap as regular headlights, do you?

I’m still not sure we’re in agreement, but maybe we are? I’m saying the US auto market has never had enough influence to block a cost-effective safety feature from appearing on foreign markets. Another person pointed out that the IR HUD was used on a luxury car and the high cost probably prevented its widespread use.

In the Twitter screenshot, sure. But in the title OP wrote? And the rhetoric I overwhelmingly see on Lemmy?

Are you correcting my post or yours? I was speaking in the past tense.