Times’ advert underprints the text, so it’s impossible to dismiss or to read on mobile

This seems likely to annoy Trump

Which means it’s probably a good idea

So “no.”

Did you bother to check the AI before accepting its translation of “dare” in either place where you’ve used it?

Equivocate much?

Dare?

Found the Kremlin disinfo bot

Did you actually read your “source”?

Found the Chinese agent

I do wish someone would tell Airstrip One that 1984 was a WARNING, not a fucking handbook!

What does this have to do with union busting?

Thank the gods someone is still teaching journalism students to investigate, follow leads, and report. I’m sick to death of storytellers masquerading as journalists.

They and the Heritage Foundation find him to be a useful idiot.

Anyone who doesn’t work for a content farm knows that it isn’t “combustion” that’s being banned but traditional gasoline-fueled internal combustion engines.

And yes, governments absolutely should enforce regulations for the greater good since capitalists are utterly incapable of doing so.

Grand, thanks. I’ve just never heard of them before

It sure as hell can’t hurt

Is this a reputable news source?

Dude! I’m agreeing with you. :)

Although in fairness, it wasn’t written into law until 1998. Seems pretty pointless since using the flag in any way is protected free speech. Maybe being unenforceable is meant to protect it from 1st Amendment challenge?

I’m autistic enough and old enough that I genuinely could not possibly care less

Typically voting Democratic. That’s the real potential crime that frightens Dear Leader