!dull_mens_club@lemmy.world is one I never post to, am not subscribed to, but I can’t help but read the post. It’s the Primitive Technology of lemmy for me

@cm0002@toast.ooo

And do you think she will take them to a better place, or something worse than Trump?

The social score on PieFed is for the purpose of “make silent” any criticism, especially when, coming to my other point, which yes, was always part of the conversation, is criticism towards a supremists idealogy that carried out a false flag and is committing a genocide against a semite population. And you keep bringing up how internet and social media works, and I keep trying to explain to you that the point of inception of lemmy is to be different, so when you create something that’s like other social media sites, and include a social credit score to silence dissent, while also shit talking the same people that are famous for a social credit score, you see how that comes across? October 7th was a false flag, where Israel killed a bunch of the people at the music festival, in order to rile Jews up to commit a genocide against a semite population. You would think that after the Reichstag fire event, and the Holocaust, Jews wouldn’t fall for this shit. It took Germans like 4 years to attempt Operation Valkyrie, and it took Americans 6 years before they elected a black guy with a Muslim name who ran on ending the Iraq/Afghanistan war, only to continue them, and start 5 more new ones. I honestly thought Jews were smarter than that, if for nothing, but from experience.

Yes, okay, so why include a social credit score in PieFed? One of the main things communist China is critized for. It seems to me like one of the main reasons lemmy was created was to get away from the social credit score/karma idealogy, so why include it in PieFed? You still can’t talk about the Hannibal Directive to me, huh? Another critique of mine about PieFed. Seems to be an Israel supremacist instance, where you can’t even discuss Israelis own Reichstag fire event that got Jews to support a genocide against a semite population.

A CCP bot that wants to attack Iran? It’s a CIA/Mossad bot/shill, and lemmy is full of them outside on the tankie instances.

So can we bomb Israel for carrying out the Hannibal Directive and killing all those Israelis to false flag Jews into committing a genocide against a semite population?

We have chaos controlled by bad actors. We’re hurting people now, and what we’re getting in return is hurting more people. We have been slowly changing for the worse since the 70s.

I still don’t fully understand why PieFed constantly shits on tankies, while having a social credit score. Nor has anyone explained if you’re allowed to talk about the Hannibal Directive there.

What part of the current society do you not want to disrupt?

Isn’t that what this argument is about? She’s not perfect on the stance, has voted to fund the Iron Dome and voted to increase police funding in Washington DC, but shes worth settling on. Not sure about most the other elected Democrats.

We will do our very best to create the most fire memes this world has ever seen. Nothing will surpass them until WW3 starts.

Sounds like antisemitism October 7th right to defend itself most moral army Hamas.

Haven’t you heard? They’re the Epsteinikof Files.

I will give you Nigeria, Venezuela, and Iran. But that is just three. Obama didn’t start 4,but 5. Somalia, Yemen, Pakistan, Libya, and Syria. Though you could make a case that Iran alone might count as like 5 countries, but we’re not there yet, though we might be, really soon. And that wars were never declared for those countries, but story for another day. I did only place the term “harm reduction” on deportations and wars though. But since I can’t get a deportation number out of you, I’d say that if Trump doesn’t reach the 3.1mil deportations that Obama had, it’s a reduction.

OK, well I can’t wait for the comparison if you can’t tell me the number Trump is aiming to surpass. Or at least how many ICE deportations there were under Biden/Obama, not CPB. Can you at least assure me that Trump will start as many wars as Obama did, or will that also be a harm reduction example?

Instead of Democrats that want to increase ICE funding, more regime change wars, more deportations, how about for once, the Democrats nominate a good candidate? Can we try that? People will settle for a Berniecrat, I’m sure. Bernie may be too old, but I do think people would settle for AOC. Not my first choice by a long shot…but I’d settle for her. People can’t keep falling for people like Obama/Biden, who promise people a loaf of bread, but won’t even bring up breadcrumbs after they’re elected.

Please do come back. I would prefer after his 4 year term, but I don’t know if lemmy will be around, or either of us(…and one other guy) but just to set a standard, how many deportations were there under Obama, aka, Deporter in Chief, and how many were there under Biden?

So if we do something else, we would have what we have now? Have you considered that what we have now is because Democrats keep nominating terrible candidates? Why are you mad at paying the cost for what Democrats have been doing for decades?

Explain that last part to me. Not trying to be a dick, just seriously wondering how you came to that conclusion. Unless you’re just being sarcastic, which I’m not getting. Cause I also disagree with you on Dean Phillips, though I wouldn’t even entertain listening to a reasoning on that one.