- 1 Post
- 4 Comments
DefectingToDPRK@lemmygrad.mlto
Ask Lemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml•How many of you were taught that the 'North's invasion of the South' (1950) and not the 'Jeju Island massacre' (1948), was the start of the Korean War?
5·2 months agoIn my experience, the only things that were significantly covered past that were: The Holocaust (I read maybe near 10 books on the subject, far more than on any other topic), a very white-washed version of the civil rights movement where we really only talked vaguely about segregation and MLK Jr., and 9/11.
DefectingToDPRK@lemmygrad.mlto
Ask Lemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml•How many of you were taught that the 'North's invasion of the South' (1950) and not the 'Jeju Island massacre' (1948), was the start of the Korean War?
3·2 months agoAbsolutely, my experience is very similar. It’s pretty stark how much more vague history we were taught became covering anything more recent than WWII. Granted, everything before that was heavily skewed to the American Imperialist perspective anyway, but we at least went more in-depth in events that happened. I could tell you more about the start of WWI than any details about any post-WWII war coming out of high school.
DefectingToDPRK@lemmygrad.mlto
Ask Lemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml•How many of you were taught that the 'North's invasion of the South' (1950) and not the 'Jeju Island massacre' (1948), was the start of the Korean War?
23·2 months agoLearning about the Jeju island massacre was the root for me breaking away from the western propaganda around the DPRK. To be honest though, as an American, we really weren’t taught about the Korean war at all. We covered the Vietnam war, pretty much just the domestic situation, focusing especially on the presidents, but completely glossed over the Korean war. It was basically a footnote in our curriculum.


B-b-b-but we have to teach the big mean Russians a lesson! /s