You don’t have to listen to the dead, have you? Just sayin’
You don’t have to listen to the dead, have you? Just sayin’
Can you not just create a local social club account and use it to save your game progress? Iirc that how it supposed to work at least
It’s plastic not wax
Well to miss something you need, in the first place, aim at it and I don’t know about you but all I can aim at blindfolded is my own feet
It won’t solve much imo. Trinity is just a little old in her design and that shows (simple effect without much interactions), at the time we had no adaptation so Trinity’s blessing was one of the few sources of DR so it made sense for it to have a short duration for more engagement. As the time passed the designs have evolved and nowadays supports in general have a lot longer base durations. Harrow can recast his rotation once every 1.5 minutes or so, Wisp has no need to recast her stuff whatsoever and so on, yet Trinity is still adhere to an old design which feels a little forced and clunky with a 25-30 seconds rotation.
As a result her gameplay is 4-3-2 into 25 seconds of action into 4-3-2 on repeat and pressing an ability doesn’t have much to it. You can’t really play without 4 and 3 active, you need them both at the same time, and you don’t have any conditions to press it. For example Harrow needs shields to have longer duration on his buff, or you can hold his 4 to save someone if you feel there might be a need.
So a cube? 0.0 and 1.1 are on a top side and 0.1 and 1.0 are on a bottom side so every line is a diagonal of a cube’s face
I like her for solo steel path stuff. She’s got an armour strip, solid dr, energy sustain, heal to get out of pickle and a subsume slot for a damage buff. Is she the best for that? Not even close. Yet she’s fun to play and I only wish DE gave her some more base duration on the abilities.
And to add on the “the second the market opens” part - landlords can buy houses even before they are fully built and liveable which is not really an option for a person with no house because such an investment leaves you with no place to live and no money (mostly).
I’m not saying all landlords do so but what you described happens quite often. Landlords buy a property when they already have a place to live in and then rent out said property to someone who has none. And now said someone can’t own a property because there’s none on the market as all are bought out so all what is left to do for those people is to rent. It’s an oversimplification of course and there’s a lot of nuance to it but the general message still stands - if a person with a house buys another house to rent it out then one less house remains to be bought for people with no house.
So… Which news website has good news again?
It seems he has all the time to farm enough tho
Uhm, me being freaking blind as usual lmao
So how do you fit 27 beers inside yourself?
Where is the “infested adversaries” option?
Exactly what I thought about
I’d go with B for obvious reasons
Well, that’s an absolute exception and no one should even consider such an occurrence to be a new standard ever
/s (just in case)
In the end the people who ran the hegemony of cable TV just got their hands on the TV streaming services and turned it into the hegemony of TV streaming service.
Nothing have changed the goals people at the top had - they just needed time to adapt
Thanks! P. S. Also now I feel stupid lol
Can’t spell “estadunidense” without “dense”, can you?