There are so many outlandish claims in this comment with basically nothing backing it up
This 100%
I deleted my reply because it was too much but the original ign article on wukong is very tame. I can’t see why they’re so worked up to harass the author off the internet.
Some days beehaw not having downvotes is a real issue.
Not sure what the end paragraph is for, bestforbritain famously only use MRP polling not national swing polling. They’re really good
Tories, Labour and Reform are very close at the moment. It’s easier for the greens and lib Dems to vote labour I guess so it makes sense to back labour to beat farage
His name is at the bottom of the page
No I think theirs is https://www.getvoting.org/
This seems to be from the guy who did “swap my vote” the last few elections. I wasn’t impressed with that one
With the number of trackers on most sites you usually get a performance boost with an extension vetting each network call
I was about to start mouth foaming, but got to the end of the name distant worlds:universe
If anyone is giving these a go make absolutely certain you’re not buying distant worlds 2 by mistake.
Star ruler as an disappointment is fair, but have you tried the totally different and now open sourced StarRuler2?
It’s a much better game, much tighter with a definite progress path for colonies shipping things to each other (later used by slipstream which is more pure management and might not fit your list)
It’s free, it’s worth a try I promise it’s very different to SR
I’m beginning to think he hates the Tory party even more than I do
The precedent would be you have to explicitly say what you’re going to do in the first vote.
Every single person in the campaign was “oh we’d never leave the single market” and when that became an option afterwards it needed a new referendum.
Until someone uses it for a little more than boilerplate, and the reviewer nods that bit through as it’s hard to review and not something a human/the person who “wrote” it would get wrong.
Unless all the ai generated code is explicitly marked as ai generated this approach will go wrong eventually.
He probably found it very hard to make any accounts on computers
You see, the music labels know that stealing from Spotify is morally correct.
The point is they reduced the sugar in coke semi secretly, they can still buy a coke it just doesn’t stop going into diabetic coma. And you find out when you’re on the way to hospital.
With recall you can search for a website you saw once, a link in a discord channel, an email all at once in one place.
The “BBC” has a long history of weird “quote style” No one “knows why”
I think it must be a spy code like those number stations
They have (or had) a suspiciously high confession rate too.
It’s worth reading the article, and better articles are available in the UK press too.
The coverup came from ignorance, no one actually knew this was happening but the NHS staff had reason to reassure patients and just assumed everything was ok without looking hard.
NHS management also didn’t look.
When ministers tried to ask about it they got told everything was fine by their civil servants. And so they go out and tell the press everything is fine.
No one can start an investigation for the suspicions because it looks like admitting it’s happening, and they genuinely didn’t know it was. Because there had been no investigation.
“Standing back and viewing the response of the NHS and of government, the answer to the question ‘was there a cover-up?’ is that there has been. Not in the sense of a handful of people plotting in an orchestrated conspiracy to mislead, but in a way that was more subtle, more pervasive and more chilling in its implications. To save face and to save expense, there has been a hiding of much of the truth,” Langstaff wrote.
“Over decades successive governments repeated lines to take that were inaccurate, defensive and misleading. Its persistent refusal to hold a public inquiry, coupled with a defensive mindset that refused to countenance that wrong had been done, left people without answers, and without justice. This has also meant that many people who are chronically ill have felt obliged to devote their time and their energies to investigating and campaigning, often at great personal cost.”
Did they also mistranslate the Chinese women commenting on trailers that the studio is gross and don’t want women playing their game?
It’s honestly tragic, if you read that article it’s primarily about the Chinese game industry culture with one game and studio used as an example because it’s a supposedly a AAA game to rival western studios.
https://www.ign.com/articles/how-black-myth-wukong-developers-history-of-sexism-is-complicating-its-journey-to-the-west
We’re being asked to believe ign has slandered a large Chinese studio, entirely made up, and kept the article up regardless. It just doesn’t hold water. Harrassing some poor women off social media and writing long comments about everything being made up is easy, but ign are still standing by the article six months after it was published.