Yes, it’s what most NSFW AI artists use anyway. Look into AUTOMATIC1111. There’s a bit of a learning curve, but it’s not too bad, and there are lots of resources online to help you learn.

Yeah… the water on her face works at first, but the more keywords I add to make her pretty and not an AI abomination with eyes pointing in different directions, the more those keywords tend to overpower the overall prompt and erase those details.

How does she poop

Ever see Naked News?

A few things that I’ve found help:

• Increase the resolution. Even when that shouldn’t help, it does, if that makes sense.
• In the negative prompt, describe types of images that aren’t photos. Anime, render, cartoon, etc.
• In the positive prompt, describe a detail that you would only find in a highly detailed image. Some people just write “highly detailed,” but that does jack shit because no one’s out there tagging photos as “highly detailed.” Or they’ll say “8k resolution,” which works, but it’s too limiting and it’ll throw off the style too much. In this case, I included “sweaty skin.” A photo that captures the texture of skin is going to be highly detailed, and those photos will become the AI’s source material. This has the side effect of making the composition rather tightly framed, but that worked here.

Hey! See my comment here: https://lemmynsfw.com/comment/614070

Holy shit. 😂

Reminds me of those 'shops of sexy Willem Dafoe.

Weird. But you’re welcome!

There were quite a few with tents on fire, fingers on fire, hair on fire… 😂

I didn’t put it in the prompt, it just happened. Lots of people specify no pubes. I imagine it would be pretty easy to do intentionally though.

It’s funny that you say that on this, of all posts.

The vast majority of people use AUTOMATIC1111 on a computer. Then, you can download supplemental resources for NSFW stuff on civitai.com. There’s a learning curve, but it’s not too bad. Just start googling; there are a ton of articles and resources out there to help you learn.

Was this intentional?

That’s a good idea, actually, I’ll start doing that.

She just looks so happy and satisfied with herself to be burning the living fuck out of her vagina.

Your comment is crowded nonsense.

What you can’t see is that her fingers are two feet long, so great for back scratches.

I referenced a real person that not many people were likely to know: Georgia Ellenwood. That’s kind of a gray area. It’s not illegal, but you could say it’s nonconsensual, which isn’t good either. Although some people do deepfake celebrities, my intent wasn’t to imitate her exactly, but rather to use that prompt as a way of styling the type of person. Since it isn’t really an accurate likeness of her, I felt comfortable posting it.

All of your images are very coherent. How do you do it?

A couple reasons, IMO.

First, hands are just super complex in the first place; it’s why they’re also hard for humans to draw. The geometry is super complex—there are tons of bones and tendons, they move in a million different ways, and they look completely different at different angles.

It also has to do with how AI works. It has to extrapolate information from a vast data set, and with all that hand complexity we were just talking about, the AI can’t get “consensus” on what hands are supposed to look like. So, it does its best and it averages out all the different possibilities. That works with a palm tree—its not important if that has 20 fronds or 25—but it has no way of knowing that it IS important for there to be 4 fingers and a thumb on each hand.

Maybe a dumb question, but what is Masterwork?