• 0 Posts
  • 36 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: February 7th, 2026

help-circle



  • He definitely didn’t say no. And I think he’d be a hell of a candidate if he did. He gets it, he’s bright enough to do the job, and he’s got the connections without the social indebtedness of the average politician. And he’d pick an AOC as a running mate in a heartbeat. Plus, if someone’s worried that white men won’t elect a brown woman, Jon Stewart is about as white as I am (albino).

    I don’t count him as “in the running” because he’s not said he’s willing to be in the running. But he’s also not saying no very loudly.



  • He’s been moving rather leftward. He is anti-gun, which does bother me. But I was once a gun-lovin’ libertarian-Republican. I learned a lot about the lies behind the entire right wing … but nobody’s convinced me yet that the people owning firearms is a bad thing. If anything, if more left-wing folks owned them, the fascist party would be a little less eager to threaten violence. After all, an armed society is indeed a polite one.

    Yeah I recognize that mass shootings are a problem and that we could be doing a whole hell of a lot more to prevent those from happening. Disarming the population to make a “Republican” fascist coup to be more likely to be successful is not how we should be addressing the problem, though. Maybe I’m crazy there? Oregon is still working to ban private gun owernship in the midst of Trump’s literal fascist coup. What The Actual Fuck, Oregon?









  • Not every men’s group is a shitty stereotype. It does seem unacceptably common, though. Not every women’s group is a safe space, and some are just as toxic and abusive as the far-too-common men’s groups. Do we ban them? I don’t think we can. Because women’s shelters need to exist even if men are domestically abused too and never in my fucking life have I heard anyone suggest a battered men’s shelter might even maybe be a good idea. Okay, fine, so violence and safety reasons … Except, shit, not everyone is hetero… A same sex partner can probably find out where women’s shelters are. And men are abused to by their partners, men and women, in alarmingly higher rates than anybody seems to take note of. And what do you do with Trans folks? Because their rights are human rights too and why the fuck do we still need to explicitly say that anymore? sigh

    And that doesn’t even begin to cover social groups.

    I guess if you’re not an asshole, a bigot, an abuser, or whatever … best you can do when you encounter these things (and you will) is ask yourself whether something gendered is reasonable or not. The answer might be yes, or no, or conflicted either way. I’d like to say that it should be okay if we don’t agree about the answers. I’d like to say that people should be able to accept that the other person is making a good faith effort to determine the relative “okayness” in an individual case with an individual perspective. Sadly, we humans seem not to be wired to do that. I’m just gonna continue thinking gendered stuff is pretty dumb on the whole with a couple of conflicted views on a couple of specific things because I know I don’t live in a perfect world.