Nonbinary (he/him) ∞

  • 5 Posts
  • 18 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 10th, 2023
  • Silvally@beehaw.orgtoGaming@beehaw.org•How many stinkers did you play this year?
    12·
    7 months ago

    Not really a “stinker” but I was disappointed with Tears of the Kingdom and have dropped it after 100 hours.

    I don’t think it helps that I’ve been playing this whilst sat next to my fiancee playing the Witcher 3 on our Steam Deck. The difference between the two games is like night and day, despite the Witcher 3 being almost a decade older.

    Tears of the Kingdom is just okay, in my opinion. I enjoyed it enough to get 100 hours out of it. I dropped Breath of the Wild after a similar amount of time too. They’re just not for me I guess, they don’t immerse me like other RPGs do.

  • Silvally@beehaw.orgtoChat@beehaw.org•I'm so tired of the current state of the internetEnglish
    1·
    10 months ago

    I honestly believe that modern social media and “the algorithm” has conditioned us into this kind of behaviour.

    It’s already quite easy to forget we are interacting with other humans when we are behind screens and keyboards. This has always been an issue on the internet.

    But when the internet is fuelled by algorithms which only want engagement, it is going to encourage behaviour which drives this. This is often extreme, sensational opinions and language. I feel like the algorithm constantly tried to show me content that would upset me. “What’s hot” is basically always “what’s controversial”, and controversy drives engagement. It certainly engaged me and I’ve had to make a conscious effort to just rip myself away from it.

    Furthermore, social media doesn’t encourage long-form discussion, and it also conditions us to seek immediate gratification. Twitter especially wants us to summarize our points in just a few words, which doesn’t lend itself to mature, thought-out discussions.

    I often make long posts here on Lemmy which I often feel aren’t really read by people or responded to because TL;DR. Me writing out paragraphs of analysis about Starfield isn’t going to get as many responses as someone simply saying “Starfield is the game of the century” or “Starfield is dogshit in every way”.

  • Silvally@beehaw.orgtoTechnology@beehaw.org•Longtermism poses a real threat to humanity
    2·
    11 months ago

    I’m not an expert on longtermarism but I have read William McAskills “What we owe the future”.

    The quote highlighted about AI is a clear demonstration on how longtermarism is being misappropriated. It describes a “rush” when the impression I got from McAskills book is that AI ethics needs to be very carefully discussed and that rushing into it is the opposite of what longtermists should do. To try and describe it briefly, this is because AI presents the risk of what McAskill describes as “value lock-in” where our current society’s values will continue long into the future, or the values that will persevere into the future will be decided by the few people who create the first generative AI.

    In reality, people like Musk probably see AI as a means to push what they believe are the correct moral values long into the future. Which is terrifying…

    This is why AI ethics is extremely important. We are already seeing institutional prejudices our current society possesses being perpetuated by AI, such as racism, sexism, etc. This is why when I saw that Microsoft/OpenAI was scrapping it’s AI ethics team that I was absolutely horrified…

    The “rush” to produce AI is a problem with Capitalism, not longtermarism. There is a rush to create the first generative AI not because it will benefit society but because it will make buttloads of money.