You know what the funniest part is?
That’s the smallest size :D (I’m kidding, but hey - to each according to their need)
You know what the funniest part is?
That’s the smallest size :D (I’m kidding, but hey - to each according to their need)
And, since it’s impolite to say bad things about dead people, there’s no “share a cauldron with Kissinger”
Me and my friend I am slowly getting radicalized
I think what they meant was “the working class has no nationality”
I wish ye all black and tans a very merry fight me like a man
The majority of Republikans are liberals too. In the classical sense of the word. Calling chuds “liberals” melts that place of theirs where the brain is usually supposed to be.
Hey! I made a meme exactly like this a couple days ago, planning to post it on Lemmygrad. Many thanks, comrade!
Doesn’t matter. It could have been their “cherry on top, absolute best-case scenario”. They still de-industrialized the EU, bled it dry, cut Russia off from Europe, somewhat weakened Russia militarily (I mean, casualties are casualties even if the ratio is 20:1, 50:1, 100:1 - they are losing well-trained experienced soldiers too).
There is no supply. If there’s not enough capacity to produce the thing - the money’s going to end up in those fat MIC pockets. End of story
Mmm yes, especially the manpower. How are you going to buy all that if there’s no industrial output to physically create them and the stocks have run dry? By telegraphing fucking aliens across the galaxy?
Fucking libs… Ugh
What these “China no socialist” ultras don’t have is lack of conceptual understanding of what socialism is. The way they think is brilliantly described by Gabriel Rockhill in his Understanding Siege Socialism appearance, where he actually quoted Mao on this topic. In essence - ultras only have sensory understanding of what socialism should be, but not conceptual - let alone doing any praxis. They don’t have a good grasp of dialectical materialism, they see socialism as “being this and that and that” - a set of characteristics that are present (or absent) in a given society.
Conceptual understanding of socialism is the realization that socialism (and communism) is first and foremost a long, painful, tedious and prudently planned contradictory process of consciously building towards a certain type of socio-economic order. It concedes that building socialism, whatever form it initially takes, means that a new society is born OUT OF capitalism and under tremendous imperialist pressure. It does not, however, preclude using different tactics (when appropriate) which may seem to contradict the overall goal or strategy.
No one in their right mind would say the USSR was not socialist, even though the NEP certainly allowed a wide range of private economic activity. Oh, by the way - it never went away fully because for that you have to develop productive forces to a colossal degree. On the other hand, the USSR did have a powerful planned/socialized sector by the time Khrushchev was in power, yet his right deviations and revisionism were obvious to many.
Perhaps it reflects their weak theoretical grounding, perhaps something else (ahem fed ahem). BTW the “global proletariat must rise up” is a big red flag imo (no pun intended). Even fucking capitalists admit China is not capitalist…