Haha brainfart. Thought about lan domains…

Who should do this vetting though? The internet was built up with the idea of technical neutrality - everything else came on top. TLDs came later and were used to either describe the origin of a page or its intended(!) use. That leads to the case that not only can a propaganda outlet mark itself as “info” - it’s actually historically correct to do so as it’s about what the host wants to communicate.

ICANN, the organisation behind the TLDs, actually always struggles with this btw. A more recent example was the decision which domain should be reserved for local name services. It took y long time (I think years overall) to get to: .internal (edited, brainfart)

Would you mind telling the source of this? Looks intuitively right but… So do so many things :/

Hm I was clearly wrong, I apologize! The excuse is that I was really tired and already quite “clickbait state of mind” ish.

Thank you for taking the time to write this! ♥

Yes. And the “survivors” don’t have a say in that if the person itself said otherwise before dying.

Training future doctors is a good cause and will most likely save lives in a similar fashion to donating a heart after all.

Edit: I removed a wrong part here claiming that the article is clickbait. I was off by a mile, see the reply to this post as to why.

Thanks! I know jack shit about this sport but find the simulation interesting.

Two things especially:

• the probability jump when each day is calculated (going actually backwards) and
• a 100% outcome prediction even for the 40/40 reached basically in the last two days.

These two in combination make me think that the model seems to be set for an optimistic pattern, is that a reasonable deduction?

Oh sorry, nvidia RTX :) Thanks!

Lowest price on Ebay for me is 290 Euro :/ The p100 are 200 each though.

Do you happen to know if I could mix a 3700 with a p100?

And thanks for the tips!

Hey, I like the initiative of sharing this!

One major point stood out to me. When reading CVs I try to match the statements with the experiences. I didn’t manage to map them. Example: you improve processes - when and where?

Either adjust the statement to the stations or vice versa. For every statement you should have a recent backing.

The second thing is the title part: this will be very hot or miss depending on the reader. Either way I recommend putting explanation and title either in one paragraph or very close together. If this would’ve need on my desk and I’d be in stress I wouldn’t have read beyond it just because it looked like an isolated joke going directly into the serious next block.

Hope this helps!

And still there are other people than you who want to do that full-time - and in doing so provide, at least for me, more value than the 6ooth marvel billion dollar movie.

There are educators and entertainers out there who chose this as a job and are good at it. If they could live off of it by going the patreon route instead of the shitty YouTube ad spam one I’d be all for it.

Uhm… Just for next time: stand up during the flight! Quick stretch or stroll to the bathroom if you feel weird just standing. Don’t punish your body for the planes hostile design!

That’s still like a hundred to one or even way worse. We can simply shove in (group reader doesn’t like) until they are so full that they can’t move any more and then pile on each individually and still have a few billion people preparing the lion BBQ for afterwards.

The numbers gap is ridiculously huge!

You don’t! You observe the result. When no interaction happens the resulting pattern is described well with wave functions. If interaction happens to determine which slit it is traveling through the double line result is seen and can be described by mechanical functions.

This “we have math for both results” for interpreted to “has properties of both wave and particle”. Which I guess was one press release away from n"it’s both and depends on if I’m looking!"

The brackets were implied by OP.

I.e. “one way: (be ignorant || approve)”.

Which of those questions from the article would you describe as loaded enough to imply the quite interesting responses?

I expected to read something like “why are Chinese people stupid?” and then some racist shit - but the answers to those questions are… Interesting.

The bankruptcy scenario is correct but the first part isn’t: you don’t have X shares as collateral that you can liquidate. Instead, you have collateral to cover sum Y.

As long as the collateral contract covers enough stock positions the bank won’t lose.

That said all of this is assuming standard contracts. If y bank wrote “0% interest and instead 50% of the revenue growth of Twitter” then this would be an easy way to lose money.

Haven’t heard of a stupid banker yet, though, so what would the chances be?

Thanks for sharing but I still don’t know what this actually does? As it’s win only at the moment I can’t give it a test run but the readme is so high level that I’m not sure.

Like, does it interface with my ollama models? Is it integrating with remote models? What’s it locating actually?

According to their page it’s a pure searxng instance. I didn’t see anything on my own instance changing so there are three options I see:

• The mentioned server side changes (e.g. A server move you mentioned but could also be server settings, provider settings, etc).
• client side changes: somehow your Firefox provides different information to alter the results
• subjective change: it’s always a possibility that either what you searched or your perception was more fine tuned to Cyrillic.

And then there’s the obligatory “none or all of the above”.

Personally I’d guess it’s just a fluke. I gave it a few searches from Firefox mobile on “all languages” and had a mix of mainly English and a bit of German und French in there as results.

Edit: if you’re comfortable with that feel free to share some search terms and we can compare results. Would be curious myself!

That… What you describe is a mesh wifi. APs plus roaming. That’s a meshed network.

The screenshot had has the criteria included though. Relevant part: either be for children or for everyone.