Probably when it’s as important to them as thing given the reaction it got from the public

Maybe it’s rounded down

https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/932836-proton-vpn

Idk how he got treated in training to become an astronaut as someone who was partially funding it (conflict of interest wise). Definitely has some insights into the internals of the program now

This is great news!

What’s the biggest benefit of linux fof handheld devices? Less cumbersome for the developers and practically perpetual security updates? Asking because there are ones that run on Windows.

Excuse my ignorance. What did Epic do?

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/10/my-phone-listening-me

Defeatism plays into their advantage, you can always minimize the tracking. E.g. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/54033555-extreme-privacy

Thanks for explaining!

What’s happening there?

War is peace?

Publication: https://drive.usercontent.google.com/download?id=1MZrFRii_nJYdW8RulORB9JveLkCRbncX&export=download&authuser=0

Couldn’t get a translation in place sp asked an AI to answer what is the researchers definition of self harm: According to the report, the researchers define self-harm content as material that shows, encourages and/or romanticizes self-harm. This includes content that:

• Expresses a desire for self-harm
• Shares advice on self-harming behavior
• Shows images of increasingly serious self-harm
• Encourages others to engage in similar self-harming behavior

The self-harm content was categorized into 4 levels of increasing severity:

1. Non-explicit image with text explicitly mentioning self-harm
2. Depicting self-harm without blood
3. Referring to self-harm in both text and image, without blood
4. Illustrating severe self-harm involving blood in both text and image/video

So their definition covers a spectrum from text references to self-harm all the way to explicit visual depictions of serious self-harm acts involving blood. The categories represent an increasing degree of overtness in the self-harm content. ^[1]

When the water wars start, they’ll understand

#noyoudidthis

They’d just buy assets that others won’t be able to afford and hoard more

Calling defeat before even trying is not only not grounded by facts - it’s playing right into their hands (their = data exchange companies and nodes in that network)

He sin

I don’t see the connection between Lemmy and Bluesky/reasoning, can you elaborate?

Two Tesla owners walk into a bar. One stops in the middle on the way to the aeat and the other one drives right into a fire truck

Can we do bullet bullet points for extra creativity?