Is this something you can see in the web interface? Or how do you know how many of the users are still active?

Because these programs cannot themselves be concerned with truth, and because they are designed to produce text that looks truth-apt without any actual concern for truth, it seems appropriate to call their outputs bullshit.

This is actually a really nice insight on the quality of the output of current LLMs. And it teaches about how they work and what the goals given by their creators are.

They are but trained to produce factual information, but to talk about topics while sounding like a competent expert.

For LLM researchers this means that they need to figure out how to train LLMs for factuality as opposed to just sounding competent. But that is probably a lot easier said than done.

This feels unreal.

Can anyone get a higher number out of this?

More time to spread the wings if it’s higher up

The article says they are trying to save money, but wouldn’t exhibiting at Gamescom also work great as an advertisement?

Or are they afraid of some protests due to some things they did recently? Not that I would know what that would be, but just wondering.

Oh no! That bomb killing a family of four emitted CO2 when exploring and burnt down a totally healthy tree! Why does no one think about the environment??

“You seem to shake your phone in frustration. Please get therapy before you do the same to your baby.”

Program a video game

Colours are mostly indistinguishable. I’m not colourblind.

Forgot the tilde in between

“former”

Search for “the backrooms” on YouTube

Do people outside of tech care?

The future!

I understand. The ride doesn’t need external assistance though. It seems to have some natural magic force that attracts billionaires. I never heard the classic being used by a person on their own, out of free will.

Maybe they both have their own specialisation, so they can coexist without competing for customers.

Somehow she looks super relatable and nice on the left, but super generic and boring on the right.

Which is a pretty counterintuitive russian tactic, Bruce like what better option for building long tables would there be than cheap Swedish modular furniture systems?

Let’s hope there is a way to cure it.

I always thought it was only genetic, so noone could do anything against a wrong eyeball shape. But this seems very uplifting.

I wonder though why this article cites mainly eastern Asian sources. Is the rest of the world not interested in curing myopia?

True. How could it be a free market if corporations are not allowed to form a cartel and agree on a price for a product that is literally vital for many people?