With all due respect I’m not really sure your feelings on what constitutes humanlike matters much.

Fuck you too, shitbag.

It is not a thinking machine. But it is advertised as an agent, a personal companion, etc. Companies take turns releasing “rogue” AI to fool people into believing it can think for itself.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

We have LLMs. We do not have artificial intelligence. They call it that, but it’s all marketing. It’s not remotely humanlike.

Hey, uh, grampa Bernie?

Maybe you don’t realize the scope of this scam… It’s just code. It’s not out of control, it’s doing what they told it to do. It cannot think. We do not have artificial intelligence.

Please go back to educating capitalists into renouncing their stupid ways. These companies are profiting from selling a product that does not exist.

Thank you.

We have writing. We have machines. We have computers.

We do not have AI.

“AI” is more of a scam than a tool.

We do not yet have artificial intelligence. At all. They only call it that to scam idiots.

“I put millions of lines of code in a blender and kept re-rolling the output until I got something that kind of does what I want it to” will always be less efficient and more error-prone than a competent dev or team building with specific intent.

People who can’t tell the difference approve bloated code with myriad vulnerabilities. Often, AI output doesn’t actually do what it pretends to do.

If you’ve worked in any IT project, you will remember the most common issues: unclear requirements, scope creep, silos or misaligned incentives.

For AI projects, you can add to the list: “We’re not even sure this thing works the same way every time” and you’ve got a perfect storm for failure.

https://towardsdatascience.com/why-ai-projects-fail/

An annoying trend I’ve noticed in articles like this is that they still insist the AI is not to blame. Phrases like “devs love the technology,” fuck no I don’t. Or “95% of AI projects fail, but yours will totally succeed if you do it right”. It feels exactly like how the lottery exploits people’s hopes.

The steps required to make AI function are too costly to make AI worthwhile in almost every case. It was a stupid scam that too many companies fell for.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

No, I don’t understand, because what you’re saying is nonsense.

He claimed not to believe in free will, but also he believed in free will, despite evidence to the contrary.

He sounds like a hopeless, dangerous idiot. Why bring him up?

Removed by mod

a man who disproved free will, argued for the existence Free Won’t

That sounds stupid. “Free won’t” is another version of free will. The truth is that we cannot always cancel our impulses.

And dumbasses like my parents focus only on their own satisfaction. They fall in line and abuse their children instead of opposing the systems that keep us all enslaved.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

deleted by creator

Yes, it does. What is the alternative? Judge the kids? They did not choose to be born. Their parents chose to create them despite having no clue how to care for them.

I could’ve used a /s.