If you really wanted capitalism gone, getting rid of humans is a lasting solution. The tricky part is getting the humans on board with the plan.

It’s probably a lot easier to convince the humans to just do communism.

One of my favourite Maos. It gives you that a good thermometer for how effective an anti-capitalist movement is. Just check how much capitalist feathers are being ruffled.

Might have been a racist spirit.

Agreed. As socialists we often struggle to educate other members of the working class on how a change in their political outlook would benefit them. Trying to change their cultural, religious, or philosophical views is not only arrogant but has also often been historically been disastrous.

Pretty much any post more than a few hours old on lemmygrad has a lone downvote on it. Either it’s a committed lib or they made a bot. Either way it’s a good example of liberal praxis.

Prime minister and Supreme leader are literally synonyms yet have such wildly different implications.

Jokes aside it’s a good conversation. It is a vague term and continues to be the world’s most popular word for the greatest crime imaginable. What I find interesting is that mass killing of people of a particular political ideology still falls out of the bounds of the ever growing definition of genocide.100,000 communists in South Korea are systematically killed and it doesn’t capture the imagination quite the same if it can’t be called genocide.

I’m not arguing that genocide should be a more vague term. I feel like a need a word for mass killing of largely unarmed demographics that is more flexible.

I don’t mind defining all war as genocide. USA gets to be the world’s most genocidal nation either way.

It’s the US starting to balkanize

I’m interested who the author of this is. It’s wild how opinionated it gets.

When they promptly forgot they ever supported it.

Neurotryingmydarndest