https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/that

That refers primarily to people or things; which refers primarily to things, and who refers primarily to people. Some authorities insist who/whom be used when making reference to people, but others, such as the Merriam-Webster dictionary, write that such prescriptions are “without foundation” and use of that in such positions is common and “entirely standard”.[2] Hence, one sees both “he is the man who invented the telephone” and “he is the man that invented the telephone.”

Dormant Don

I prefer eleventyleven

But not every microscopic organism is an animal

Good job it was just animals then

Just learn both! But ich_iel has a lot more going on, so prioritise German.

Tickety-boo

In addition to what Skua said, it’s also worth pointing out that Reform, the main far-right party, led by the repulsive Nigel Farage (Brexiteer, friend of Trump, and so on), also made major gains, and came second in many constituencies. So although Labour has a majority now, things could get very ugly next time around if they don’t do a good job.

Saarland

I didn’t know that was a thing, and now I want to unknow it

Curved. Swords.

Red guy should’ve waited three years to respond to that

Or cutting off the electorate’s to nose to spite its face

I’m not a lady, but I am a fan of a good pump

Feel like I’ve seen this in Tbilisi before. Where was this one?

лишишь

It’s true. In English we string words together instead of putting them into one word, so there’s not really much difference beyond the odd bit of morphology.

This sounds a lot like an issue that can be solved by slightly opening a window

Never underestimate the internet’s ability to correct mistakes

Wait until you see them in cursive…