These were all first page results, hope this helps comrade. Try to do your own search next time.

• https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2016/10/15/wiki-o15.html
• https://observer.com/2016/10/obama-makes-first-appearance-in-wikileaks-receives-admin-list-from-big-banker/
• https://newrepublic.com/article/137798/important-wikileaks-revelation-isnt-hillary-clinton
• https://wallstreetonparade.com/2016/10/wikileaks-bombshell-emails-show-citigroup-had-major-role-in-shaping-and-staffing-obamas-first-term/

What compels people to sign their own execution warrants? This person would have written about how slaves don’t have the right to runaway because it compels their master to chase them down.

Everyone eats bugs already though. The acceptable limit of bugs in food is greater than zero.

It is just a right wing meme about the future hell scape created by their scapegoat and totally not by capitalism.

Biden has gone out of his way to claim credit for the economy, so this is a reasonable critique of what a good economy looks like to neolibrals. He also appointed Yellen as treasurer, so he agrees with the current monetary attack on labor. Biden signed a bill expanding food stamp work requirements. His foreign policy has also directly contributed to food insecurity.

Just don’t look up the poster for green.

Rape and sexual coercion has been observed in many animals and is hardly unique to dolphins. If you look at humans we display horrific behavior on scales no animal is capable of especially to our prey(which may include humans). Dolphins are aggressive predators and sexually aggressive as well, but I don’t think it is reasonable to judge other animals using human morality. Dolphins exhibit altruism helping injured and dying members to stay afloat. Dolphins are able to communicate through vocalization with each other and are able to exhibit multigenerational social learning. Dolphins also exhibit other undesirable behaviors like infanticide. It’s important to have a nuanced view on the world and banish black and white moralism.

I think it is import to respect animals and nature for what they actually are instead of what you want them to be, but for symbology most people don’t think rapist when they see a dolphin.

In my mind, I included them with dolphins which were excluded. We know they are already fighting the good fight.

I’m not going to suggest dolphins because they have already been used, but I like animal imagery so I want to recommend a couple to consider.

• Ants and Bees: strong association with working and communal effort
• Crows: intelligent communal animals who are also a bit vengeful and represent transition
• Flamingos: LGBTQ+ association and groups that works together while allowing individuality
• Elephants: Big, stronk, and have deep community ties enough to morn each other

The biggest issue is there may be difficulty translating animal imagery across cultural boundaries.

Two iraq wars? Two bush presidencies? Two towers?

I don’t think utilitarianism is a useful tool for analyzing structural problems. Which is what I was trying to condense into a funny quip. If you look at Peter Singer, the most prominent modern day utilitarian, you still see that he has terrible takes on pretty much anything geopolitical and isn’t an anti-capitalist. I actually don’t have a problem with consequentialism generally, but the materialist analysis is just more effective. I have limited philosophical knowledge so I probably can’t answer your actual question.

Instead of dismantling the machine that runs on human blood we will limit the amount of blood to the smallest quantity that can allow the machine to run at maximum capacity.

I don’t know why you expected this community to endorse fascist slogans. Reconsider your revisionist stance.

You do a structured sale overtime and those do take place even in the billions of dollars without destroying the value of the stock. Also, they can borrow against the value of the stock, usually for extremely low interest rates, to quickly infuse cash. This argument is nonsense. The best recent example is elon buying Twitter. Yes it hurt tesla stock in the short term but it is almost back to the presale value with little impact on his overall networth. The wealth in stocks is very real.

Edit: The elon case isn’t even a good example because he was forced to sell the stock much faster than normal.