Crimes are prosecuted by the state. It’s hard if the victim is uncooperative, but not impossible.

That’s… stupid honestly

So … they raped each other? They could both go to jail?

I would prefer they did, but it isn’t the most important thing about my phone. My current phone does not, and I really like it.

Honestly, I bet he has the skills, he just didn’t use them because he didn’t care, or is overworked, or for whatever reason.

It’s not forbidden.

My thoughts exactly.

They are overtly sexual… but not moreso than many other ads.

Oh no… Anyway…

It’s like a subscription based YouTube replacement. Like nebula or something. But mostly it’s just LTT that has content there.

If it’s ts fun and entertaining, I think they hit their mark.

Oh wow … I definitely see someone trying to do that.

I love this method and would use it if it weren’t so incredibly time consuming. How are you supposed to test 30 students that way? Nevermind 300.

The point is the students can’t get to the higher level concepts if they’re just regurgitating from what chatgpt says.

I feel like it would get much better a mistake if they did… I use both windows and Linux now. I would rather use Linux full time but some software, specifically office and some (not most, but a few) don’t play nice with Linux.

If I just lost a ton of programs that I would say are critical for windows, no doubt I switch full time unless my work prevents me.

I think a lot of us have been voting as best we can.

I mean, the entire goal of the technology was to create human-like text.

Do you believe basically every politician supports slavery and murder then?

They specify human life.

But, I would point out they also say

"We support strengthening the specific rights of animals against abuse and neglect at the hands of those meant to steward them, recognizing them as more than inanimate property. We seek to regulate more strictly animal research, especially pound seizures. We call for stricter regulation of factory farms and stockyards, and the repeal of food-disparagement laws and so-called “ag-gag” laws that prohibit free speech regarding animal agriculture. We support local and family-owned farms and farming cooperatives as essential to ethical, sustainable, and humane consumption. "

I’m quoting Wikipedia which has sources for the claims I made.

But besides that, it seems like the most logical 2ay to talk about what a group believes is to look at what they say about what they believe. That is read their platform.

If you think they are describing their own platform I’m bad faith, I think it’s on you to demonstrate that.

I would be interested in you demonstrating that to me. It would certainly affect my opinion of them if you did so.

Sorry, I misread what you wrong and thus was very unclear. My mistake.

They explicitly support “a universal healthcare system as well as an economy containing widespread distribution of productive property, in particular increased worker ownership and management of their production.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Solidarity_Party

If you view that as supporting the status quo, then I don’t think I understand your position.