!blstpls

PS: Searching for generic terms yields 100% fake glasses, so I took a specific person I remember having strong glasses for myopia.

Just love it thanks

i’m a man and i’ve had women reject me for my partner count many times for being too much or too little.

Is it TMI for them to even be asking that?! Unless you mean a few dates in or something maybe

Does any benefit at all remain? What about stealth if they somehow have some kind of radar thing?

Don’t even wanna ask if this is right b/c it’d mean sloppin’ at the trough when you’re a little OVER THAT

This random web-enabled model, not GPT, started with constancy.

This behavior increases enjoyment and utility of the Internet. Thank you!

Grown man with expensive bicycle and tight-fitting clothes

Funniest non-vandalism caption (I seem to recall they didn’t like the monkey who masticates while others watch—wasn’t me but suppose would be in the logs from 10-20yr back)

Very very rarely emailing executives can get stuff fixed, amazing when it works though

Oh yee CEOs who lack the visibility they need…

Just checked in the parallel universe what you would’ve been up to instead, turns out the two of you bought a lottery ticket as a goof & won

(life was never simple or pure again) PHEW dodged it

Small bite for me please

And then the rest of it

So the first knocker-upper was late

Thought it could be a liability sometimes! Maybe that ship sailed

Cut off on Voyager iOS:

paranoid

Mm who wants to rely on someone keeping a verbal promise when it says in writing something like your privacy is at stake?

Download a little offline Wiki for rainy days folks!

I take connectivity for granted but shouldn’t. Batteries charged, books on the shelf, offline games and media stored locally…

Nice

Can’t believe they let him in

That makes you different eh? Love that. Means I could actually use it :D

Congratulations!

Tradeoff question—

Should I expect to find some semblance of safety in sticking with the largest open source browser project I can find, given perhaps the eyeballs etc., or would you reckon not (or even perhaps the opposite, security through obscurity & Umbra is “safer” than Firefox)?

Maybe this is so “lightly” forked it’s “just” stripping + cosmetics & the risk profile is essentially identical?

I wonder if there’s a parallel universe where the labs instead went to the other extreme and require intelligence tests to onboard to their platforms.

And the outcry is, not inappropriately, about how many are being denied access to the latest technologies. The policy could effectively be construed as racist, even.

Anyway the middle ground there is pretty obvious. (Though I’m not sure how I’d design it just right, so e.g. folks without access to traditional/expensive mental healthcare might still be able to see some small benefit if it’s determined to be safe, just like maybe it could be safe for a well-adjusted individual to complain to it about their day for a couple minutes before moving on to real things. Sure I suppose it’s inherently unsafe but a proportion of the population should be making that decision for themselves.)

I just tried this with ChatGPT three days ago and there’s a chance they have tried to make it slightly less sycophantic

I was essentially trying to get it to tell me I was the smartest baby born in whatever year like that YouTuber—different example but it was so resistant to agreeing to me or my idea or whatever being unique/exceptional.

Hope this is a specific direction and not random chance, A/B testing, etc.